BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is z – y = y – x?

Expert replies
by mehravikas » Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:05 pm
If x, y, and z are integers, and x < y < z, is z – y = y – x?

(1) The mean of the set {x, y, z, 4} is greater than the mean of the set {x, y, z}.
(2) The median of the set {x, y, z, 4} is less than the median of the set {x, y, z}.


Source: MGMAT
OA: C
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by real2008 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:32 am
i think answer is E
Join the discussion

by zeenab » Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:44 am
Hi,

1)
Mean of {x,y,z,4} > Mean of {x,y,z}

This means that atleast 2 numbers in x y z are less than 4. This condition can only bring the mean higher by adding 4 to the set.
Also solving this
(x+y+z+4)/4 > (x+y+z)/3
gives x+y+z < 12

however the set can be anything in the range
x,y,z = 1,3,5 , or 1,2,8
Insufficient

2)
Median of {x,y,z,4} < {x,y,z}
This does not restrict the values of x,y,z
4 can be anywhere, so the sorted order can be anything
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z
x,y,4,z
x,y,z,4

Median of {x,y,z} = y
for the median of {x,y,z,4} to be less than y,
these two are only possible
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z

still it doesnt give us much information about how the numbers are spread.
Insufficient.

Now lets try to combine the two.

x+y+z < 12 from 1)

from 2) firstchoice is out, 4,x,y,z as we cannot have the above condition with this.

So the choice is x,4,y,z and x+y+z < 12

I dont think its possible for the values of x,y,z to satisfy both the conditions. So we can know that z-y not equal to y-x.

Can someone confirm?
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:25 pm
Your explanation is in sync with MGMAT's explanation. However, I am looking for a shorter way to solve this problem.

Thanks,
Vikas
zeenab wrote:Hi,

1)
Mean of {x,y,z,4} > Mean of {x,y,z}

This means that atleast 2 numbers in x y z are less than 4. This condition can only bring the mean higher by adding 4 to the set.
Also solving this
(x+y+z+4)/4 > (x+y+z)/3
gives x+y+z < 12

however the set can be anything in the range
x,y,z = 1,3,5 , or 1,2,8
Insufficient

2)
Median of {x,y,z,4} < {x,y,z}
This does not restrict the values of x,y,z
4 can be anywhere, so the sorted order can be anything
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z
x,y,4,z
x,y,z,4

Median of {x,y,z} = y
for the median of {x,y,z,4} to be less than y,
these two are only possible
4,x,y,z
x,4,y,z

still it doesnt give us much information about how the numbers are spread.
Insufficient.

Now lets try to combine the two.

x+y+z < 12 from 1)

from 2) firstchoice is out, 4,x,y,z as we cannot have the above condition with this.

So the choice is x,4,y,z and x+y+z < 12

I dont think its possible for the values of x,y,z to satisfy both the conditions. So we can know that z-y not equal to y-x.

Can someone confirm?
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:22 pm
I don't think there is any shorter way to solve this:
best you can do is substitute numbers for 1 and 2 but you still need to do consider a few cases when you combine both:
my solution:

is z – y = y – x or 2y=x+z. basically asking whether y is the arithmetic mean of the numbers x,y and z

1) not sufficient.
take the set (2,3,4) and then take (1,2,5)
in (2,3,4) 3 is the AM. while in (2,2,5), 2 is not.

2) take the numbers (4,6,8) and then take the numbers (4,5,10)
not sufficient.

combining
from 2,
x+y+z/3<x+y+z+4/4
x+y+z/3-x+y+z/4<1
x+y+z/12<1
x+y+z<12

from 1,
the only form will be (x,4,y,z) because
if you take (4,x,y,z). X is atleast 4 y atleast 5 and z atleast 6 and the sum will be >12

if you take x,y,z,4- the new median will be Y+z/2 which is greater than y so not possible
so the form is (x,y,4,z)

new median less than Y

4+y/2< y
4+y<2y
y>4

take Y values >4, z>Y and sum of X Y and Z <12.
there will be no set where Y is the mean.
Answer C
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion