BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute value question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Absolute value question

by logitech » Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:35 pm
lightbulb wrote:Guys, this is from the GmatPrep:

If zy < xy < 0, is |x - z| + |x| = |z|

(1) z < x

(2) y > 0

Answer: D

Could someone please explain the answer?

Thank you.

zy < xy < 0

means that zy and xy have both two numbers with different signs. ( +-) or (-+)

and you will see that they both have "y" in common

SO:

A ) If Y>0 (X and Z) < 0 and X > Z so that we can have zy < xy < 0

B ) if Y<0 (X and Z) > 0 and X < Z so that we can have zy < xy < 0

Lets go back to statements:

1 ) z < x

This means that x - z > 0 so it can get out the absolute value sign as it is

and we also know that if x > Z they have to be both NEGATIVE NUMBERS ( look at A )

so:


IS |x - z| + |x| = |z| ?

X-Z + ( -X ) = -Z

which is |z|, since Z is negative it needs to be -Z

Sufficient :D

(2) y > 0

We already discussed this

A ) If Y>0 (X and Z) < 0 and X > Z so that we can have zy < xy < 0

Sufficient :D

Hence, it is D
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by lightbulb » Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:23 pm
Thanks. I used your response to solve the problem as follows:

Given:

If zy < xy < 0, is |x - z| + |x| = |z|

We can have two possibilities:

(I) y > 0. This implies
- z and x are both negative
- z is more negative than x (z < x)

(II) y < 0. This implies
- z and x are both positive
- z > x

So here we go:

(A) z < x
Now, either y > 0 or y < 0.
If y < 0, then both z and x are +ve, but, then z cannot be less than x because zy < xy < 0.

This implies: y > 0. Which further impiles z and x are both negative.

Plug z = -3, x = -2
|-2 - (-3)| + (-2) = (-3)
1 - 2 = -3
-1 = -3
The above statement is not true.
Therefore, under the given conditions, the algebraic expression is false - for sure.
So (A) is sufficient.

(B) y > 0
This impiles z and x are both negative and the problem reduces to (A).
So, (B) is also sufficient.
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon May 25, 2009 9:38 am
is |x - z| + |x| = |z|
distance between x and z + distance between 0 and x = distance between z and 0

This means, on a number line : 0................x..........z
we are also given zy < xy < 0

Statement 1 : z < x

If x>z, then automatically the answer to this Question is No.
we arrive at a conclusion using this statement that is |x - z| + |x| = |z| is not correct

Statement 2 : y > 0
this is same as statement (1)
ie : z < x

Thus is |x - z| + |x| = |z| is incorrect

With both the statements we are able to arrive at the same conclusion that is |x - z| + |x| = |z| is incorrect

So answer has to be D

Please correct me if I am wrong

Regards
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon May 25, 2009 8:16 pm
Karan - I think you didn't consider the possibility that z and x are both negative here; the number line could look like this:

----z------x----------0------y--------


This is an odd question, since you can solve it without using either of the statements. I explained further in this thread:

www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-math-zy-x ... t5848.html
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion