This is equivalent to finding out if -1 < x < 1.
1. Let's split this up into cases:
a. x < -1, then |x + 1|= -x - 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve the equation:
-x - 1 = 2 - 2x
x = 3. This however is not consistent with the initial assumption, of x < -1.
b. x is between -1 and 1. You get that |x + 1| = x + 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve for x:
x + 1 = 2 - 2x
3x = 1, with x = 1/3. This is consistent with -1 < x < 1. So x = 1/3 is a solution of the equation.
c. x > 1 making our equation:
x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3 - consistent with x > 1. So x = 3 is also a solution of the equation.
So 1 has two solutions: 1/3 and 3, which means that 1 is insufficient.
2. is insufficient, since this only tells us that x is not equal to 3.
Take both stmts together and you eliminate one of the solutions of stmt 1, meaning x = 3. Then you are left with x = 1/3, and you can tell that |x| <1.
So C is indeed correct.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
abs. value
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Perfect....maria you can't ask for more than this...DanaJ wrote:This is equivalent to finding out if -1 < x < 1.
1. Let's split this up into cases:
a. x < -1, then |x + 1|= -x - 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve the equation:
-x - 1 = 2 - 2x
x = 3. This however is not consistent with the initial assumption, of x < -1.
b. x is between -1 and 1. You get that |x + 1| = x + 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve for x:
x + 1 = 2 - 2x
3x = 1, with x = 1/3. This is consistent with -1 < x < 1. So x = 1/3 is a solution of the equation.
c. x > 1 making our equation:
x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3 - consistent with x > 1. So x = 3 is also a solution of the equation.
So 1 has two solutions: 1/3 and 3, which means that 1 is insufficient.
2. is insufficient, since this only tells us that x is not equal to 3.
Take both stmts together and you eliminate one of the solutions of stmt 1, meaning x = 3. Then you are left with x = 1/3, and you can tell that |x| <1.
So C is indeed correct.
















