litteraround wrote:What do you mean by E (as in Either) or the option E (Neither).
If you mean the latter, then I think you are right.
May I ask something...if you already have a score of 760, you are already on the top of the world. What purpose would it solve by getting an 800, which I don't think any amount of preparation will guarantee anyway.
With E, a problem-response on GMAT-Data Sufficiency means that "statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed." So I meant the same, my dear friend!
By the way the "target 800" was an old dream of mine, which I still cherish. No one gets to the top of the world merely by scoring a 760 on GMAT, please note.
We know that out of 100 who request for the information, 50 apply for admission to the program and the other 50 don't. We need to know how many of the 50 who apply for admission to the program eventually get enrolled.
I. It says that 10 of the 50 who apply for admission to the program were extended offers of acceptance. After this stage, a candidate may or may not go for it. Colleges never lean on. Hence, insufficient, so, A, D out, and B, C, E is the lot where our answer lies.
II. Half of those who receive offers of acceptance enroll in a different MBA program. Alright! So, how many of the 50 applications receive offers of acceptance? We don't know, so insufficient, and B disappears. Our lot is C, E now.
[spoiler]Let's C why E.[/spoiler]
When we take the two statements together, we know that 10 out of the 50 applications were extended offers of acceptance, and 5 of those turned antagonistic and moved to a different MBA program. Does that mean that the remaining 5 eventually enroll in the program? Do they have any bond with this college? Should we assume on GMAT?
[spoiler]
Hence E[/spoiler]