inequality

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:52 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:620

by yalanand » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:24 pm
I feel answer is E


1) Suppose x=1.9 then still the given equation is greater than 0..and x< 3

2) Not sufficient as explained above..

Combining both of them Not sufficient.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:27 am
Thanked: 7 times

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:32 pm
To prove X >3.

1) (X-3) (X-2) (X-1) >0

To make this hapenne..
1. X should not equal to 3 or 2 or 1.
2. either all of then are +ve or at least 2 of them are -ve.

But cant say whether X>3 or not, because for X=4 this relation is true, but it is also tru for X=1.7. so NOT SUFF

2) X>1, simpally X=2 is false but x=4 is true for the statement given. so NOT SUFF


but combining both will say this,
X>1 and X is not 1,2,3 it means x>3.

Ans : C
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: inequality

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:31 pm
Is x-3 > 0

1. (x-3) (x-2) (x-1) > 0

- - +
+ + +

are the only two ways we can have a positive product

we don't know which so INSUF

2. x>1[/quote]

Hmm

x-1> 0 means

x>1 so we still can not find out whether x>3 ( on another note, if this option was x>4 , we would choose B )

1+2 together


- - +
+ + +

so we have one POSITIVE for sure so we are left with

- - or + +

we now that x >1 but if it is less than 2

we will have

- -

if x is greater than 3 we will have

+ +

Do we know anything about where x lies ? NO

E
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:33 pm
welcome wrote:To prove X >3.

1) (X-3) (X-2) (X-1) >0

To make this hapenne..
1. X should not equal to 3 or 2 or 1.
2. either all of then are +ve or at least 2 of them are -ve.

But cant say whether X>3 or not, because for X=4 this relation is true, but it is also tru for X=1.7. so NOT SUFF

2) X>1, simpally X=2 is false but x=4 is true for the statement given. so NOT SUFF


but combining both will say this,
X>1 and X is not 1,2,3 it means x>3.

Ans : C
This is a very nice solution but we are NOT told that X can be only integer.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:27 am
Thanked: 7 times

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:36 pm
logitech,
Where is this mentioned that X should be an integer. Or it is some kind of rule or assumption. Please tell me the details.

Thanks in advance.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:40 pm
welcome wrote:logitech,
Where is this mentioned that X should be an integer. Or it is some kind of rule or assumption. Please tell me the details.

Thanks in advance.
Well nothing is mentioned about X so it can be any number. Fraction or integer.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"