BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep / Wage increase

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by earth@work » Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:50 pm
(1) Jacks hourly wage was 5$/hr more than Mark
Let x be mark's wage/hr then jacks=x+5
Difference after 6% increase will be = (x+5)*(106/100)-x*(106/100)
where the variable x cancels out and we get the answer.... (1) is sufficent
(2)Jack:mark =4:3
let x be total wages then Jack's =4x/7 mark's = 3x/7
After 6% increase difference = (106/100)*(4x/7-3x/7)... we hv no other info therefore (2) is insufficient
ans A
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:02 pm
Let M be Mark's wage/hr and J be Jacks wage/hr
We need to find out J -M

Given that J and M had a 6% increase in wage/hr.
So wages per hr will be 1.6J and 1.6M.

Stmt1:
Before increase
J = M +5
=> J-M = 5 ------------ 1
After the increase we have.
1.6J - 1.6M = ?
= 1.6(J-M) ------------ 2
Substituting 1 in 2
= 1.6 * 5
Sufficient.

Stmt 2.

J/M = 4/3.
J = 4M/3.

After the increase, we have
1.6J = (1.6 *4 * M)/ 3
1.6J = 1.6 * 4M/3

We cannot find J -M.. Hence insufficient.

So A
Join the discussion

by raajan_p » Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:54 pm
You can even substitute values

Lets take the before wage increase salary of Jack as 10 and Mark as 5.

After considering 6% wage increase, the sal of Jack would be 10.6 and that of Mark would be 5.3

You can substitute any number for Mark and a value which is 5 units greater than Mark for Jack..you will get the same difference...

So, you can find the difference and hence A is sufficient...

W.R.T statement 2) we know only the ratio of Jack to Mark as 4:3, but not the actual values...

So insufficient...

Hence A.
Join the discussion