BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Explain please..

Expert replies
by aditikedia » Sun Oct 05, 2008 2:52 am
Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.

A) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out
B) encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
C) had encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
D) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses peeking out
E) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses that are peeking out

Source: Manhattan GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by eshahid » Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:17 am
it should be D
B and C can be ruled out for the use of wrong verb from 'encountered' or 'had encountered'.
A can be ruled out for the use of 'whose' which seems to qualify 'shallows' rather than crocodiles themselves.
Between D and E, D is a better choice. The relative pronoun 'that' in E is uncalled for.
Shahid E

=========================================
"DESTINY is not a matter of chance, Its a matter of CHOICE"
Join the discussion

by aditikedia » Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:36 pm
doesn't the use of 'with' right after shallows modify shallows? how is this correct?
Join the discussion

by ska7945 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:36 am
a, b, c-whose incorrectly modifies shallow
e-that are-wordy
imo d
let's beat GMAT.
Join the discussion

by ranagaurav » Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:39 am
whats the OA
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:48 pm
I will also go with D
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:34 pm
Straight (D)
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Sat Jun 26, 2010 5:56 pm
is it a rule that 'whose' should modify the immediately preceding noun , as it is a case with 'which'?

Pl. suggest.......
Join the discussion

by pnk » Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:13 pm
aditikedia wrote:Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.

A) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out
B) encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
C) had encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
D) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses peeking out
E) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses that are peeking out

Source: Manhattan GMAT
A, C & D: whose modify immediate previous noun. But I think we can't drop A bcoz of shallows, which is part of prep phrase. Therefore crocodiles or lurking can be its referent. But, more than that this choise is wrong for 'are peerking' - simple present ...as encounter is in simple present. E also out bcoz of 'continuous tense'. IMO D - though comma prep though not correctly modifies previous clause still appears the right compared with others.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1