Explain please..

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:14 am

Explain please..

by aditikedia » Sun Oct 05, 2008 2:52 am
Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.

A) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out
B) encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
C) had encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
D) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses peeking out
E) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses that are peeking out

Source: Manhattan GMAT

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:51 am
Location: India
Thanked: 3 times

by eshahid » Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:17 am
it should be D
B and C can be ruled out for the use of wrong verb from 'encountered' or 'had encountered'.
A can be ruled out for the use of 'whose' which seems to qualify 'shallows' rather than crocodiles themselves.
Between D and E, D is a better choice. The relative pronoun 'that' in E is uncalled for.
Shahid E

=========================================
"DESTINY is not a matter of chance, Its a matter of CHOICE"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:14 am

by aditikedia » Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:36 pm
doesn't the use of 'with' right after shallows modify shallows? how is this correct?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:14 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ska7945 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:36 am
a, b, c-whose incorrectly modifies shallow
e-that are-wordy
imo d
let's beat GMAT.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:40 am

by ranagaurav » Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:39 am
whats the OA

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:48 pm
I will also go with D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by Bidisha800 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:34 pm
Straight (D)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:18 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by ansumania » Sat Jun 26, 2010 5:56 pm
is it a rule that 'whose' should modify the immediately preceding noun , as it is a case with 'which'?

Pl. suggest.......

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:39 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by pnk » Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:13 pm
aditikedia wrote:Many daring vacationers who participate in guided boat tours on the Tarcoles River encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out from the surface of the murky water.

A) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses are peeking out
B) encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
C) had encountered native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, whose eyes and noses peek out
D) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses peeking out
E) encounter native crocodiles lurking in the shallows, with eyes and noses that are peeking out

Source: Manhattan GMAT
A, C & D: whose modify immediate previous noun. But I think we can't drop A bcoz of shallows, which is part of prep phrase. Therefore crocodiles or lurking can be its referent. But, more than that this choise is wrong for 'are peerking' - simple present ...as encounter is in simple present. E also out bcoz of 'continuous tense'. IMO D - though comma prep though not correctly modifies previous clause still appears the right compared with others.