BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

LSAT...

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 173 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri May 14, 2010 11:16 am
kaulnikhil wrote:Can someone pl explain this
Its very strange No one has responded to this LSAT !

Anyways, IMO B!!

The author concludes that Supreme court wont be able to withheld individual human rights.It ignores the possibilty that possibilty that the persons who holds the Judicial power can "sometimes" go beyond the said explicit provisions and can grant Justice.

I could share more explanation if its correct! Plz share OA!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 9 times

by kaulnikhil » Fri May 14, 2010 12:36 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:Can someone pl explain this
Its very strange No one has responded to this LSAT !

Anyways, IMO B!!

The author concludes that Supreme court wont be able to withheld individual human rights.It ignores the possibilty that possibilty that the persons who holds the Judicial power can "sometimes" go beyond the said explicit provisions and can grant Justice.

I could share more explanation if its correct! Plz share OA!
OA E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Fri May 14, 2010 9:01 pm
I went for B. Please explain the reasoning behind E.

Cheers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1