BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

LSAT...

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri May 14, 2010 11:16 am
kaulnikhil wrote:Can someone pl explain this
Its very strange No one has responded to this LSAT !

Anyways, IMO B!!

The author concludes that Supreme court wont be able to withheld individual human rights.It ignores the possibilty that possibilty that the persons who holds the Judicial power can "sometimes" go beyond the said explicit provisions and can grant Justice.

I could share more explanation if its correct! Plz share OA!
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Fri May 14, 2010 12:36 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:
kaulnikhil wrote:Can someone pl explain this
Its very strange No one has responded to this LSAT !

Anyways, IMO B!!

The author concludes that Supreme court wont be able to withheld individual human rights.It ignores the possibilty that possibilty that the persons who holds the Judicial power can "sometimes" go beyond the said explicit provisions and can grant Justice.

I could share more explanation if its correct! Plz share OA!
OA E
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Fri May 14, 2010 9:01 pm
I went for B. Please explain the reasoning behind E.

Cheers
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1