Critical Reasoning

Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D 849 - 899) personally translated a number of Latin texts into Old English. One historian contends that Alfred also personally penned his own law code, arguing that the numerous differences between the language of the law code and Alfred's translation of Latin texts are overweighted by the even more numerous similarities. Linguistic similarities, however, are what one expects in texts from the same language, the same time, and the same region. Apart from Alfred's surviving trasnlation and law code, there are only two other extant works from the same dialect and milieu, so it is risky to assume here that linguistic similarities point to common authorship.

The passage above proceeds by :

(A) Providing examples that underscore another argument's conclusion.
(B) questioning the plausibility of an assumption on which another argument depends.
(C) showing that a principle if generally applied would have anomalous consequences.
(D) showing that the premises of another argument are mutually inconsistent.
(E) using argument by analogy to undermine a principle implicit in another argument.

OA: B

@Verbal Experts: Can you please share your detail analysis for this CR ? Also, please share your thoughts on the reasons to eliminate Option [spoiler]C & E[/spoiler] ?