BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

verb tense question

Expert replies

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Wed Feb 02, 2011 1:36 am
Ikonik wrote:I'm thinking up some... hope I'm not far from correct

- if the money were available with the company, the policies would be different today.
correct - uses were with would

- if I were not so rich, I would have learnt to work hard long ago (here I use would have, is 'were' correct).
Incorrect - uses were (cond. II) with would+have (cond. III)

- If my cat were not so lazy, he would be healthier today
Correct - uses were with would

- If my cat were not so lazy, he would have caught some mice around here? (would have)
Incorrect - for the same reason above.
Confused :(
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by Ikonik » Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:53 am
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote: Care to tell us what's the problem with each version?
If I were a rich man, I would have bought a house.
If I were a rich man, I would buy a house.

I would have bought the house, If I were rich enough
I would buy the house, if I were rich enough

I will buy the house, If I were rich enough
I will buy the house, if I am rich enough (?)

What about these:
- if the money were available with the company, the policies would be different today. (I think correct)
- if I were not so rich, I would have learnt to work hard long ago
(maybe it should be - If I had not been so rich, I would have learnt to...)
- If my cat were not so lazy, he would be healthier today (i think correct)
- If my cat were not so lazy, he would have caught some mice around here? (would have)
(I think it should be: If my cat had not been so lazy, he would have... )

Thanks :D
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:06 am
Ikonik wrote:
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote: Care to tell us what's the problem with each version?
If I were a rich man, I would have bought a house.
If I were a rich man, I would buy a house.

I would have bought the house, If I were rich enough
I would buy the house, if I were rich enough

I will buy the house, If I were rich enough
I will buy the house, if I am rich enough (?)

What about these:
- if the money were available with the company, the policies would be different today. (I think correct)
- if I were not so rich, I would have learnt to work hard long ago
(maybe it should be - If I had not been so rich, I would have learnt to...)
- If my cat were not so lazy, he would be healthier today (i think correct)
- If my cat were not so lazy, he would have caught some mice around here? (would have)
(I think it should be: If my cat had not been so lazy, he would have... )

Thanks :D
everything is cleared except for three points

if I were not so rich, I would have learnt to work hard long ago SHOULD BE if I were not so rich, I would learn to work hard long ago (Present Unreal Condition, I'm reach-I don't learn...)

If I had not been so rich, I would have learnt to (Past Unreal Condition, I was not reach-I didn't learn...)

If my cat were not so lazy, he would be healthier today - Style problem, healthier than~comparative form, better
If my cat were not so lazy, he would be healthy today.

If my cat were not so lazy, he would have caught some mice around here? incorrect (would have)
(I think it should be: If my cat had not been so lazy, he would have... ) <-- the same as above with Present vs. Past Unreal Conditions
Join the discussion