NextGreatLeader wrote:I'm taking the official exam soon, and reading the forums has been hugely helpful and inspiring for me. However, some of the stories have also freaked me out -- namely the stories where people scored significantly higher on their practice tests than they did on the actual exam (more than just the expected standard error).

It seems to me that most of these stories are caused by major verbal drops, yet quant is largely consistent (+/- 2 points). Any ideas why that is? Is it just because more people are stronger in quant than verbal? Are test prep companies just not as good at testing verbal? Also, are there specific stories of major quant score decreases?

A lot of students want to know whether or not the official practice test software is a reliable predictor of one's performance on test day. The short answer to this question is "not necessarily."

Yes, the GMATPrep test software is a reliable predictor of your proficiency with the GMAT content. But it's not necessarily a reliable predictor of your ability to function effectively in a formal testing environment.

The reason for this is that you're not taking these practice tests in a formal testing environment; you're taking them in the comfort of your home. Plus, the practice tests are low stakes. They're free, and the results don't matter. They have no effect on your ability to get into a Business School.

The official test (in a formal testing center) is much different. It costs $ to take the test. You're stressed, and this tests counts.

Bottom line: The formal testing environment can cause considerable anxiety, and students' score often suffer as a result. As part of your preparation, I think it's a good idea to work on the mental/confidence aspect of the test. I'm fond of positive visualization, but everyone needs to find the strategy that works best for them.

If you're interested, we have a free video on reducing test anxiety: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gener ... es?id=1252

Cheers,
Brent