BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

undermines the conclusion

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:00 am
Thanked: 3 times

by gaurav_gaur » Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:35 am
I will go with e
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 7:18 pm

by VyDinh » Tue May 14, 2013 8:01 pm
IMO: E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 7:51 pm

by ndqv » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:19 am
Stimulus: P(women win) = P(men win), 15% of candidates are women => "few women win the election few want to run"

A. out of scope - "reelection"
B. contender. However, "run against each other" doesn't happen among women only, so only that reason may not lead to the stated fact.
C. opposite - supports the argument
D. same as A
E. contender - women want to run but many of them cannot get adequate funding. It is preferred due to the explanation above for B.

Choose E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 3:07 amFollowed by: 1 member

by khushboogandhi12 » Sun Dec 08, 2013 12:23 am
Answer: E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:08 am

by likee » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:52 am
Wonderful explanation! thanks
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:53 pm

by amitchauhan » Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:36 am
I would go with B.

I think B is not right as its stating the fact that few women run elections what ever be the reason.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:53 pm

by amitchauhan » Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:37 am
I would go with B.

I think E is not right as its stating the fact that few women run elections what ever be the reason.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:48 pm

by gmatisgay » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:39 am
It's E, IMO
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:35 am

by JurgenPeci » Tue Feb 11, 2014 2:14 am
I think is E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:05 am
Thanked: 2 times

by ajaysingh24 » Sun Feb 23, 2014 1:38 am
Going with E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:41 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by Nijo » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:39 pm
I was confused between A and E, but finally picked E. A while tempting does not solve the real issue, even if lesser women won the re-election, the number of women was anyway less to begin with.
If the conc is there are lesser women in office because lesser women run, the answer should look for an alternate reason why more women could have run (but didn't)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 7:54 am

by lulufrenchie » Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:50 pm
I am going with E too.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 6:36 am
GMAT Score:730

by Kamal2014 » Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:43 pm
gmatnmein2010 wrote:Last year in the United States, women who ran for state and national offices were about as likely to win as men. However, only about fifteen percent of the candidates for these offices were women. Therefore, the reason there are so few women who win elections for these offices is not that women have difficulty winning elections but that so few women want to run.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion given?
(A) Last year the proportion of women incumbents who won reelection was smaller than the proportion of men incumbents who won reelection.
(B) Few women who run for state and national offices run against other women.
(C) Most women who have no strong desire to be politicians never run for state and national offices.
(D) The proportion of people holding local offices who are women is smaller than the proportion of people holding state and national offices who are women.
(E) Many more women than men who want to run for state and national offices do not because they cannot get adequate funding for their campaigns.

My ans was C but I am wrng again y????

LSAT
OA is E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:26 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by jaspreetsra » Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:26 am
Not sure!
E?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 9:33 pm

by sid08 » Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:04 pm
I think E is the correct answer which exactly points out the reason of women not running the election.
The author says women are not willing to run. And women have equal chances to win as men have.
E option points out another important reason of funding which creates more problem to women than men. I
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply