BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

undermines the conclusion

Expert replies
by gmatnmein2010 » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:14 pm
It is proposed to allow the sale, without prescription, of a medication that physicians currently prescribe to treat the common ear inflammation called "swimmer's ear." The principal objection is that most people lack the expertise for proper self-diagnosis and might not seek medical help for more serious conditions in the mistaken belief that they have swimmer's ear. Yet in a recent study, of 1,000 people who suspected that they had swimmer's ear, 84 percent had made a correct diagnosis - a slightly better accuracy rate than physicians have in diagnosing swimmer's ear. Thus, clearly, most people can diagnose swimmer's ear in themselves without ever having to consult a physician.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the conclusion?

A) Case in which swimmer's ear progresses to more serious infections are very rare.

B) Most of those who suspected incorrectly that they had swimmer's ear also believed that they had other ailments that in fact they did not have.

C) Most of the people who diagnosed themselves correctly had been treated by a physician for a prior occurrence of swimmer's ear.

D) Physicians who specialize in ear diseases are generally able to provide more accurate diagnoses than those provided by general practitioners.

E) For many people who develop swimmer's ear, the condition disappears without medical or pharmaceutical intervention.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thephoenix » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:22 pm
A) Case in which swimmer's ear progresses to more serious infections are very rare. - Really, who cares?

B) Most of those who suspected incorrectly that they had swimmer's ear also believed that they had other ailments that in fact they did not have. Ok, so it talks about the suspicion of people but leads us to other ailments. Will leave it as a weak contender

C) Most of the people who diagnosed themselves correctly had been treated by a physician for a prior occurrence of swimmer's ear. - Aha, this indicates bias - What if the people already new they had swimmers ear. So basically the sample is kinda self selected. Strong Contender

D) Physicians who specialize in ear diseases are generally able to provide more accurate diagnoses than those provided by general practitioners. - Totally out of scope

E) For many people who develop swimmer's ear, the condition disappears without medical or pharmaceutical intervention.
Totally out of scope

So IMO ans is C
Join the discussion

by gmatnmein2010 » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:42 pm
OA is C
Join the discussion

by komal » Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:43 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:It is proposed to allow the sale, without prescription, of a medication that physicians currently prescribe to treat the common ear inflammation called "swimmer's ear." The principal objection is that most people lack the expertise for proper self-diagnosis and might not seek medical help for more serious conditions in the mistaken belief that they have swimmer's ear. Yet in a recent study, of 1,000 people who suspected that they had swimmer's ear, 84 percent had made a correct diagnosis - a slightly better accuracy rate than physicians have in diagnosing swimmer's ear. Thus, clearly, most people can diagnose swimmer's ear in themselves without ever having to consult a physician.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the conclusion?

Conclusion : Most ppl can diagnose swimmer's ear in themselves without ever having to consult a physician

The author has come to the above conclusion (most ppl) by sampling few ppl (1000 ppl)
We can weaken the argument by showing some kind of disparity in the data/characteristics of the group sampled.


A) Case in which swimmer's ear progresses to more serious infections are very rare.
Incorrect : This does not help in weakening the argument in any way.

B) Most of those who suspected incorrectly that they had swimmer's ear also believed that they had other ailments that in fact they did not have.
Incorrect : Other ailments is clearly irrelevant to the scope of the argument.

C) Most of the people who diagnosed themselves correctly had been treated by a physician for a prior occurrence of swimmer's ear.
Correct : Weakens the argument by showing that most ppl who diagnosed themselves correctly had previously been treated by a physician and hence they had knew about symptoms of swimmer's ear.

D) Physicians who specialize in ear diseases are generally able to provide more accurate diagnoses than those provided by general practitioners.
Incorrect : General Practitioners v/s Ear Specialists is out of scope

E) For many people who develop swimmer's ear, the condition disappears without medical or pharmaceutical intervention.
Incorrect : Issue is not about treating swimmer's ear, issue is about diagnosing swimmer's ear. Eliminated.
Hope this helps : )
Join the discussion

by analyst218 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:57 pm
i reasoned in the exact same way as komal did.
C
Join the discussion