declined by 89 percent since 1986, a rate even more alarming

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 am
Thanked: 22 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:680

by beatthegmatinsept » Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:48 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:is this sentence correct ?

Hammerhead sharks have declined by 89 percent since 1986, a rate even more alarming than that of white sharks (79 percent) and tiger sharks (65 percent).
I dont think so. I see parallelism error between Hammerhead sharks...rate of white sharks.. and tiger sharks..
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:10 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:is this sentence correct ?

Hammerhead sharks have declined by 89 percent since 1986, a rate even more alarming than that of white sharks (79 percent) and tiger sharks (65 percent).
My thoughts on this

Later part could undergo a correction. - "a rate even more alarming than that of white sharks (79 percent) and that of tiger sharks (65 percent)."
However , the position of the later part starting from "a rate ....." is after 1986.. obviously that is not the rate..
So, in my opinion , the correct sentence could be like
Since 1986, Hammerhead sharks have declined by 89 percent , a rate even more alarming than that of white sharks (79 percent) and that of tiger sharks (65 percent)

Please let me know the correction that was prescribed by the source of this question
@Deb

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:14 am
this is from scientific American. I wonder if the use of a rate of is correct ?

• Page 1 of 1