Diseases

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

Diseases

by nileshdalvi » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:18 pm
Diseases have always plagued the earth's living
organisms. Scientists believe that huge numbers
of plant and animal diseases have developed
and been eradicated naturally over time.
This ongoing emergence and disappearance of
diseases is ignored by those who blame the
widespread incidence of cancer entirely upon
man's alteration of naturally occurring substances
to, for instance, produce bigger and
better food sources. For example, some claim
that the use of hormones to increase meat
production heightens the risk of cancer in
people who eat meat. People who hold this
view need to accept the fact that even if cancer
was not such a prevalent disease, another
disease would have arisen naturally to take its
place.
Which one of the following identifies a flaw in
the passage's reasoning?
(A) The writer wrongly assumes that the use
of hormones in meat production never
has an effect upon people who eat meat.
(B) The writer ignores the fact that scientists
are developing cures for some types of
cancer.
(C) The writer does not consider the fact that
a number of diseases have not yet been
discovered.
(D) While the writer identifies a group that
believes cancer is caused by man's interference
with natural forms of food production,
he does not identify or recognize
scientists who disagree with this contention.
(E) The author does not acknowledge that
man's alteration of naturally occurring
substances might trigger the emergence
of new diseases.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:24 pm
IMO E
A) Author doesn't assume this...
B) cure is irrelevant
E) as author says many diseases have developed and been eradicated. But what if they have been developed by men's interference?
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:30 am
between D and E

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by nileshdalvi » Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:33 am
You are right Cans

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:00 am
Lol. I thought this was a reading passage

I pick E

The argument talks about naturally occurring diseases and its disappearance. However, the author fails to note that by altering naturally occurring substances, man could create new diseases artificially as opposed to naturally

A - The author doesn't assume this at all
B - We are not interested in the development of cures for cancer
C - Irrelevant
D - No information given of people who oppose this view