BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

tricky one

Expert replies
by DavoodBeater » Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:39 am
I had these kinds of tricky questions in my high school, but I forgot it. But now I know :)
---------------------------

What is the value of x?

(1) |x| < 2

(2) |x| = 3x – 2

source: ManhattanGMAT

OA: B
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:33 am
1 by itself is obviously not sufficient, since -2 < x <2
2 gives you two options:
a. x>=0 , which is the equivalent of x = 3x - 2, giving you x = 1
b. x<0, so that -x = 3x - 2. For this one you would have 4x = 2, with x =1/2. But 1/2 is not a negative, which means that the given equation has only one possible answer: x = 1.

So I'd go with B.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:09 pm
Great point DanaJ!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by DavoodBeater » Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:54 am
exactly; you r right.
this the point which i neglected at the test.
pay attention to these kinds of question later on, especially if you need a high score :)
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:00 pm
WHY? Is trhis considered a difficult one?

I don't get it! What's difficult and what's not in DS? ;(
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by mdavis » Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:53 pm
I don't understand why you set up the equation as a positive x and a -x? I thought absolute value gets rid of negative numbers? So why do you set up -x=3x-2? I'm just not getting this.
Join the discussion

by coffee5251 » Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:40 pm
DanaJ wrote: b. x<0, so that -x = 3x - 2. For this one you would have 4x = 2, with x =1/2. But 1/2 is not a negative, which means that the given equation has only one possible answer: x = 1.

So I'd go with B.
Hi, what do you mean when you say the given equation has only one possible answer : x=1? What does this have to do with 1/2 not being negative?
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:19 pm
mjjking: I do not know if this is a difficult one... I think it all depends on your previous experience with math. For me, it's 8th grade level, although a bit tricky... For someone who has been more focused with humanities (and therefore probably lost touch with math a long time ago - BUT THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT!) it might seem a bit complicated. That does NOT, however, mean that you cannot catch up and get a better score than me in quant! All you have to do is practice, ask questions and ask for help. Now, here is your problem: "WHY?" what? Which part do you not understand? Please let me know and I'll be happy to help you!

mdavis: The first statement tells us that the value of x is between -2 and 2, since |x| < 2. There are a lot of possible x-es: -0,345; 1,7234 etc... Therefore it is not sufficient.
The second statement is useless unless you split it up in two. The absolute value does not tell us if x is a negative or a positive number. It just tells us its... absolute value! You should not automatically assume that |x| = x, since x could be a negative. If this is the case, |x| = -x.
-X IS NOT NECESSARILY A NEGATIVE VALUE, it's just the opposite of X!
Let me give you an example: |-2| = 2 (and I think you will agree on this with me). But in the same time 2 = - (-2), so |-2| = -(-2).
So, since you do not know the sign for x, you try to split up the equation in two.
1. x is positive or equal to zero, which is the equivalent of |x| = x. This results in x = 3x - 2, with 1 being the answer. Now you need to check if x = 1 is consistent with your original assumption, that x >= 0. And it is! jackPot! :D
2. x is negative, with |x| = -x (since x is negative, -x will be positive). This means that -x = 3x-2. After solving this equation you get that x = 1/2. Now, again, you have to check if x = 1/2 is consistent with the original assumption that x is negative. But, oops, it doesn't, so that means that -x = 3x -2 does not have a negative solution and therefore it's a dead end.

So in the end, you get just one value for x, which is 1. This is why B is the correct answer.

coffe5251: Please check the above and let me know if you need extra explanations.
Join the discussion

by sjd00d » Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:16 am
DanaJ wrote:1 by itself is obviously not sufficient, since -2 < x <2
2 gives you two options:
a. x>=0 , which is the equivalent of x = 3x - 2, giving you x = 1
b. x<0, so that -x = 3x - 2. For this one you would have 4x = 2, with x =1/2. But 1/2 is not a negative, which means that the given equation has only one possible answer: x = 1.

So I'd go with B.
DanaJ,

You rock and I SUCK!!! I know traps like this but make the mistakes nonetheless.

Ladies/Gents,

For Equalities/inequalities that has Modes, assume negative if you want but once you get the answer, check its validity against the problem. I've seen at least half a dozen of these in last two weeks.
Join the discussion