BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

tricky 1 from Prep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Apr 30, 2014 11:27 am
There isn't an obvious way to rephrase this question. We can't cross-multiply because we don't know whether p is negative. (You could rephrase giving yourself a positive and negative case, but this can become confusing). The best thing to do it to try to PROVE INSUFFICIENCY when looking at the statements.

Question: Is (1/p) > r/(r^2 + 2) ?

1) p = r

Test values to prove insufficiency:
If p and r both equal 1: (1/1) > 1/(1^2 + 2) --> 1 > 1/3 yes.
If p and r both equal -1: (1/-1) > -1/((-1)^2 + 2) --> -1 > -1/3 no.
Insufficient.

2) r > 0

This tells us nothing about p. Insufficient.

1 & 2) Together, if r > 0 then p > 0. We only need to test positive values:
If p and r both equal 1: (1/1) > 1/(1^2 + 2) --> 1 > 1/3 yes.
If p and r both equal 2: (1/2) > 2/(2^2 + 2) --> 1/2 > 2/6 yes.
If p and r both equal 3: (1/3) > 3/(3^2 + 2) --> 1/3 > 3/11 yes.

Any positive value we test would give us a "yes" result. The answer is C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu May 01, 2014 3:11 am
Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2) ?

(1) p = r
(2) r > 0
Alternate approach:

Statement 2 is clearly INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 1: p=r
Substituting p=r into the question stem, we get:
1/r > r/(r² + 2)?

(1/r) - r/(r² + 2) > 0?

(r² + 2 - r²) / [r(r² + 2)] > 0?

2 / [r(r² + 2)] > 0?

1 / [r(r² + 2)] > 0?

Case 1: r>0
1 / [r(r² + 2)] > 0
1/(positive*positive) > 0
1/positive > 0.
positive > 0.
In this case, the answer is YES.

Case 2: r<0
1 / [r(r² + 2)] > 0
1/(negative*positive) > 0
1/negative > 0
negative > 0.
In this case, the answer is NO.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Since only Case 1 is possible, the answer to the question stem is YES.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri May 02, 2014 11:02 pm
(1) If p = r, let's plug in p = r = 2, and ask if ½ > 2/6, we get a YES. Or if we plug in p = r = -2, and ask if -½ > -2/6, and we get a NO. Hence, insufficient!

(2) It only tells about r, no info about p. Hence, insufficient!

When taken together, since both p and r are equal and positive, even if we now try a fraction for p and r, like if we plug in p = r = ½, and ask if 1/(½) > (½) /(¼ + 2) or "Is 2 > 2/9", we still get a YES. [spoiler]Hence Sufficient!

Take C
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion