Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Triangles Problem (geometry)

Expert replies
by vongdn » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:31 pm
This is a geometry problem so I will try my best to describe the figure shown.

You have two triangles shown, both with equal interior angles x, y, and z. So the triangles are similar because they have the same angles. The left triangle is drawn as larger than the right triangle. The base of the smaller triangle is shows as equaling s, and the base of the bigger triangle is show as equaling S.

If the area of the triangle on the right is twice the area of the triangle on the left, then in terms of s, S = ?

Since the area of a triangle is 1/2 b * h

I come up with the equation 2*( 1/2 (s*h) ) = 1/2 (S*h)....I solve that and get S=2s

However the answer says that S = sqr_root(2)*s or (2^(1/2))s

What am I missing?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by neerajkumar1_1 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:00 pm
what u r missing is that u assumed that height of the triangles is same...

2(1/2 s h) = 1/2 S H
S = 2 s h/H

since the two triangles are similar... and the ratio of their areas is 1/2 then the ratio of their sides will be in the ratio 1/root(2)

hence H= root(2) h

therefore S = 2 s h/(root(2)h)
= root(2)s
Join the discussion

by vongdn » Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:17 pm
neerajkumar1_1 wrote:what u r missing is that u assumed that height of the triangles is same...

2(1/2 s h) = 1/2 S H
S = 2 s h/H

since the two triangles are similar... and the ratio of their areas is 1/2 then the ratio of their sides will be in the ratio 1/root(2)

hence H= root(2) h

therefore S = 2 s h/(root(2)h)
= root(2)s
Thanks, I knew I was doing something probably dumb.

Can I ask, how you got that h:H was 1:root(2)? Was it because the ratio of areas was 1:2, and because for h and H you are dealing with length, you must then take the root(1/2), ie root(1)/root(2) kind of like going from cm^2 to cm?
Join the discussion

by neerajkumar1_1 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:47 am
vongdn wrote:
neerajkumar1_1 wrote:what u r missing is that u assumed that height of the triangles is same...

2(1/2 s h) = 1/2 S H
S = 2 s h/H

since the two triangles are similar... and the ratio of their areas is 1/2 then the ratio of their sides will be in the ratio 1/root(2)

hence H= root(2) h

therefore S = 2 s h/(root(2)h)
= root(2)s
Thanks, I knew I was doing something probably dumb.

Can I ask, how you got that h:H was 1:root(2)? Was it because the ratio of areas was 1:2, and because for h and H you are dealing with length, you must then take the root(1/2), ie root(1)/root(2) kind of like going from cm^2 to cm?
yes ... remember when the sides are similar the sides are in comparative ratio...
so since the area is give... which is side * side... then each side will be in the ratio of a under root of that factor...
Join the discussion