BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Treatment

Expert replies
by showbu » Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:08 pm
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

A. Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.
B. Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.
C. Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.
D. People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.
E. Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employee error.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bidisha800 » Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:05 pm
(C)
Drill baby drill !

GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
Join the discussion

by gg1 » Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:23 am
IMO B

If many accidents result due to error by the employees not holding safety certi. so even if the employer bars anybody with drinking problem from holding saftey certificate will not reduce the risk of accidents .

C is not correct bcoz there is no mention of losing jobs .
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:28 am
IMO B

Agree that C is out of scope here.
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by jeevan.Gk » Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:20 am
one more B buddy
Join the discussion

by cartera » Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:14 am
Imo D
Join the discussion

by poonam1279 » Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:27 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by dnkcdnguy » Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:10 am
Great question and I narrowed it down to B and C. However, due to the conclusion stating that any employer should bar anyone that has been treated for a drinking problem, C is the most logical answer IMO. C undermines this statement because workers will be hiding their problem and not seeking treatment, which will have a negative impact.
"If you fail to plan,..then you plan to fail"
Join the discussion

by dnkcdnguy » Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:11 am
Great question and I narrowed it down to B and C. However, due to the conclusion stating that any employer should bar anyone that has been treated for a drinking problem, C is the most logical answer IMO. C undermines this statement because workers will be hiding their problem and not seeking treatment, which will have a negative impact.
"If you fail to plan,..then you plan to fail"
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:10 am
Answer is (C).


The argument talks about accidents happening among employees having safety-sensitive jobs. (B) talks about employees who doesn't safety-sensitive jobs.
Join the discussion

by dnkcdnguy » Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:40 pm
showbu,

What is the OA?

Thanks
"If you fail to plan,..then you plan to fail"
Join the discussion

by raghu_g_p » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:52 am
C for me.

B talks about non safety sensitive jobs. Hence no impact on the argument.
Join the discussion

by umaa » Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:17 pm
In B, It says, Many accidents. MANY is not equal to MOST. So, B is wrong.

IMO C.
Join the discussion

Poon Poon

by nattatob » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:46 am
IMO C ... treatment and sensitive work are both significant subjects to define not only just sensitive work on B.
Attachments
CAHL94SO.jpg
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:55 am
I see a,c, e, all undermine the argument. pls, help
Join the discussion