tough one again

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:39 am
GMAT Score:620

tough one again

by gmat620 » Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:52 pm
Another of Hoyle's arguments can be summarized as follows: on Earth, all the natural occurrences of methane that we know of are associated with "methanogens" (methane-producing bacteria). But there is evidence that methane is also present in some inter-planetary material in comets, for example. Therefore, it is likely that methanogens are present in these materials also. Which of the following is true of this argument?

A) It would be strengthened by the discovery of other compounds which occur both on earth and in comets, and whose terrestrial occurrence is strongly correlated with bacterial action.
B) Since this argument appeals to no analogies between terrestrial and extra-terrestrial phenomena, it does not need any explanation of how methanogens synthesize methane.
C) This argument has no evidential force with respect to the extra-terrestrial existence of bacteria unless it can be supplemented with an explanation of the process by which terrestrial bacteria synthesize methane.
D) The plausibility of Hoyle's conclusion would be seriously weakened if on-site explorations of other planets in our solar system were to reveal the existence of methanogenic bacteria there.
E) It would be strengthened if it were discovered that methane is generated in Antarctica, without bacterial action, at low temperatures, which approximate those of comets far out in the solar system.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:13 am
Thanked: 3 times

by krishnakumarhod » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:37 pm
IMO C

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:23 am
Location: frankfurt
GMAT Score:620

by usualsuspect » Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:48 am
IMO A.
This is a circular arguement. Evidence -->conclusion-->substantiates more evidence.
Only choice A talks about strengthening the argument.
Aëtou gēras, korydou neotēs.
"An eagle's old age (is worth) a sparrow's youth".

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:51 am
Thanked: 1 times

by rseeker2 » Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:56 am
Agree with usualsuspect. A.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:39 am
GMAT Score:620

by gmat620 » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:20 am
OA : A...but why not C ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Azerbaijan/Baku
Thanked: 2 times

by S0laris » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:34 pm
I think it's E correct, bcz author tries to provide alternative explanation of methane origination, but his argument solicits to support it by any evidence or finding - E -is that evidence of alternative explanation.
we are the champions !

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Azerbaijan/Baku
Thanked: 2 times

by S0laris » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:45 pm
S0laris wrote:I think it's E correct, bcz author tries to provide alternative explanation of methane origination, but his argument solicits to support it by any evidence or finding - E -is that evidence of alternative explanation.
Upss :roll: my bad, falling asleep, just missed the conclusion )
Therefore, it is likely that methanogens are present in these materials also.

Then it''s clear A -is correct
we are the champions !

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:04 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:620

by bmlaud » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:46 pm
IMO A
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 7:58 am
I believe the correct answer should be A