BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

0<x<1

Expert replies
by adthedaddy » Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:23 am
Hi,

I came across following explanation in MGMAT Book-3. Would like to understand how it is derived.

If x^2-x<0 then 0<x<1.

Please help me understand the above statement.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Ian Stewart » Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:25 am
adthedaddy wrote:Hi,

I came across following explanation in MGMAT Book-3. Would like to understand how it is derived.

If x^2-x<0 then 0<x<1.

Please help me understand the above statement.
There are quite a few ways to analyze this type of inequality. Two algebraic solutions:

We can rewrite the inequality: x^2 < x. Now, this inequality can't be true if x is negative, since if x were negative, then x^2 would be positive and would be greater than x. So we know x > 0, and that means we can divide by x on both sides of the inequality to find x < 1. So 0 < x < 1.

Or we can factor. If x^2 - x < 0, then (x)(x-1) < 0. Now we have a product of two terms which is negative, so one of the terms is negative, the other positive. But x-1 is certainly smaller than x, so it must be that x-1 is the negative term and x the positive term. So x - 1 < 0 and thus x < 1, and x > 0, so 0 < x < 1.

Or there's a general 'number picking' approach you can use to analyze any inequality with a simple power of x on either side (so you can use this to analyze inequalities like x^3 > x^2, or 1/x^3 < 1/x, or x^98 < x^97). Test four different values of x: one value less than -1, one value between -1 and 0, one value between 0 and 1, and one greater than 1. If the inequality is true for that one value, it will be true for the entire 'zone' from which you took that value. So if you plug in, say x = -2, x = -1/2, x = 1/2 and x = 2 into the original inequality x^2 < x, we find the inequality only works for x = 1/2. So it only works for the 'zone' of values between 0 and 1, and 0 < x < 1.

That number picking strategy should only be used though in cases where you have simple powers of x on either side of an inequality. It won't typically give you the right answer in more complicated situations.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion