statement II if we take values in fractions
x=-0.5, y = 0.3 x+y = -0.2 xy = -0.15 x+y < xy
x = -0.5, y = 2 x+y = 1.5 xy = -1 then x+y > xy
so insufficient
statement I mode of x = y
x= -0.5 and y = 0.5 x+y = 0 xy = -0.25 x+y > xy
x = -0.5 naad y = -0.5 x+y = -1 xy = 0.25 x+y <xy
insufficient
how it is C
veritas prep question
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
- PussInBoots
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:47 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
You can only have the mode of a set. There's no such thing as "the mode of a number".hmboy17 wrote:DS question-
is x+y > xy?
1) mode of x = y
2) x<0<y
Ans please?
I guess 2 is itself to answer this question
exp- if x= -2 y= 3
then x+y > xy ( 1 > -6)
but the OA is C. aNY ONE EXPLAIN.
Even if we could take the mode of a number (which I maintain that we can't and is a nonsensical idea), it would have to be the number itself; however, statement (2) clearly states that x does NOT equal y.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

















