BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tough absolute value DS

Expert replies
by doclkk » Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:17 am
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x – 1|

(2) |x – 3| > 0

OA: C

How to rephrase [spoiler]- explanation ? : We can rephrase the question by opening up the absolute value sign. In other words, we must solve all possible scenarios for the inequality, remembering that the absolute value is always a positive value. The two scenarios for the inequality are as follows:

If x > 0, the question becomes “Is x < 1?”
If x < 0, the question becomes: “Is x > -1?”
We can also combine the questions: “Is -1 < x < 1?”[/spoiler]

Can someone explain to me how it is -1 < x < 1. I don't understand how they came up with that.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Tough absolute value DS

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:56 am
doclkk wrote:Is |x| < 1 ?

Can someone explain to me how it is -1 < x < 1. I don't understand how they came up with that.
Let's ask, when will |x| < 1?

For absolute value, there are going to be two solutions: one in which the bracketed term is positive, one in which it's negative. In this case:

+(x) < 1

or

-(x) < 1

Solving each one:

+(x) < 1
x < 1

-(x) < 1
(divide both sides by -1, which reverses the inequality:)
x > -1

So, in order for "|x| < 1", -1 < x < 1.

We could also have just thought it through. For absolute value, the sign inside the bracket is irrelevant - after simplifying and then performing the absolute value operation, whatever was inside becomes positive.

Therefore, any negative fraction, 0 or any positive fraction will have an absolute value of less than 1. Another way we could rephrase the question:

"Is x a negative fraction, positive fraction or 0?"
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Re: Tough absolute value DS

by doclkk » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:24 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
doclkk wrote:Is |x| < 1 ?

Can someone explain to me how it is -1 < x < 1. I don't understand how they came up with that.
Let's ask, when will |x| < 1?

For absolute value, there are going to be two solutions: one in which the bracketed term is positive, one in which it's negative. In this case:

+(x) < 1

or

-(x) < 1

Solving each one:

+(x) < 1
x < 1

-(x) < 1
(divide both sides by -1, which reverses the inequality:)
x > -1

So, in order for "|x| < 1", -1 < x < 1.

We could also have just thought it through. For absolute value, the sign inside the bracket is irrelevant - after simplifying and then performing the absolute value operation, whatever was inside becomes positive.

Therefore, any negative fraction, 0 or any positive fraction will have an absolute value of less than 1. Another way we could rephrase the question:

"Is x a negative fraction, positive fraction or 0?"
Thanks for the explanation!
Join the discussion

by hk » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:41 pm
Statement (1), says |x + 1| = 2|x – 1|

Removing the absolute value sign, results in 2 scenarios:

1. (x+1) = 2 (x-1) if x is positive
2. -(x+1) = -2 (x-1) => am i wrong here??? in this case i'm always getting a value of 3 and hence i got the answer as A, since (2) is anyways insufficient!!

Can somebody explain this to me!!!

Thanks
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion

by abhinav85 » Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:50 am
2. -(x+1) = -2 (x-1) => am i wrong here???
In the second case over here it will be

either -(x+1) = 2 (x-1) or

(x+1) = -2 (x-1).

Note:The negative can only be at one side not both the sides.
Join the discussion

by mike22629 » Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:51 am
I always like to use the number line

So first rephrase the information so the two units in the absolute value sign are subtracted from one another

So:

A)
l x - (-1)l = 2*lx-1l

What does this actually say?
That the distance between x and -1 is twice the distance between x and 1

Use number the determine which numbers qualify under these constraints

1st possibility
---------(-1)--------0----(x = 1/3)-----1

Notice the distance between x and -1 = 4/3 and the distance between x and 1 = 2/3 (Hence twice the distance so this qualifies)

2nd possibility
---------(-1)-------0--------1-------2-------(x=3)

Notice the distance between x and -1 = 4 and the distance between x and 1 = 2 (Hence twice the distance so this also qualifies)

So A is insufficient

B) lx-3l > 0, which can be rephrased to say that x DOES NOT equal 3

Hence Answer is C, because this eliminates one of the two possibilities and x must equal 1/3
Join the discussion