BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality Madness

Expert replies
by heshamelaziry » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:38 pm
Is x > y ?

(1) -4x + 2y < y - 3x

(2) wx > wy


In statement 2, why can't I divide each side by w and get x > y ??????????????
Last edited by heshamelaziry on Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sanjana » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:35 pm
Statement 1
-----------

2y-y < -3x+4x
y<x - sufficient.

Statement 2
------------

wx-wy > 0
w(x-y) > 0

Now either W>0 and X-Y > 0 ==> X>Y
or W<0 and X-Y < 0 ==> X<Y

Hence the answer could be yes or no.
Insufficient.

IMO : A

Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:05 pm
sanjana wrote:Statement 1
-----------

2y-y < -3x+4x
y<x - sufficient.

Statement 2
------------

wx-wy > 0
w(x-y) > 0

Now either W>0 and X-Y > 0 ==> X>Y
or W<0 and X-Y < 0 ==> X<Y

Hence the answer could be yes or no.
Insufficient.

IMO : A

Whats the OA?[/quot


In statement 2, why can't I divide each side by w and get x > y ??????????????

OA is A. how you figure to do it this way rather than what I am describing above that is correct too !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by regor60 » Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:52 am
Simple reason can't divide by w. Assume w=-3 and x=-2, y=1 so

wx>wy = (-3)*(-2)> (-3)*(1) TRUE

divide by w

x>y = -2>1 FALSE
Join the discussion

by aakar » Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:59 am
Just make a note to remember that in inequalities you can't multiple or divide by a variable, because the variable could be negative and could potentially flip the greater/less then sign.
Join the discussion

by sanjana » Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:25 am
In Inequalities you should never divide by a number unless you know the sign of the number.

Also Suppose you have a normal equation
say,
X^2-X = 0

if you divide by x you get,
x-1=0,hence x=1
By doing this you have missed one solution of the equation completely,i.e x=0
You should always do,
x(x-1)=0
hence,x=0 or x=1.

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion