More than 2 mins again :)

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

More than 2 mins again :)

by netigen » Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:54 pm
It's taking me more than two mins to solve this, any shortcuts?

If the sequence x1, x2, x3, …, xn, … is such that x1 = 3 and x(n+1) = 2(xn) – 1 for n > 1, then x20 – x19 =

A. 2^19
B. 2^20
C. 2^21
D. (2^20) - 1
E. (2^21) - 1
Last edited by netigen on Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:56 am
Location: India
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:730

by getneonow » Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:28 am
Cannot read the question properly. Some symbols are missing.

Can you repost it again?

Neo
MBA : My passion and My pursuit

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

Re: More than 2 mins again :)

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:06 am
netigen wrote: If the sequence x1, x2, x3, …, xn, … is such that x1 = 3 and x(n+1) = 2(xn) – 1 for n = 1, then x20 – x19 =
The part I've bolded: I'm sure you mean for n>1.

With any sequence question, I think it's a good idea to write down the first three or four terms, at least. It's normally very fast to do, and if a pattern emerges, you'll be more likely to see it. Here we have:

x_1 = 3
x_2 = 5
x_3 = 9
x_4 = 17

The question asks about the difference of consecutive terms, so look there for a pattern:
x_2 - x_1 = 5 - 3 = 2^1
x_3 - x_2 = 9 - 5 = 2^2
x_4 - x_3 = 17 - 9 = 2^3

From there, it's reasonable to predict that:
x_(n+1) - x_n = 2^n
x_20 - x_19 = 2^19

That's not what a mathematician would consider an airtight proof- we've just recognized a pattern, and guessed it will continue forever. But it does give the right answer, and normally will on the GMAT.

We can certainly do this more rigourously. Again, if we write the first terms down:

x_1 = 3
x_2 = 5
x_3 = 9
x_4 = 17

we notice that, for 1 <= n <= 4, x_n = 2^n + 1. Will all the terms be in this form?

Using the definition of x_(n+1), if x_n = 2^n + 1, then:

x_(n+1) = 2x_n - 1 = 2(2^n + 1) -1 = 2^(n+1) + 1

So if one term is in this form, every term that follows must also be in this form- indeed for every term, x_n = 2^n + 1.

Then
x_20 - x_19 = 2^20 + 1 - (2^19 + 1) = 2^20 - 2^19 = 2^19.

There are quite a few other ways to get to the answer here, though I'm not seeing a '15 second' solution. There may well be one, however.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:41 am
Thanked: 14 times

by aatech » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:28 am
Mine approach is same as Ian's

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 7:04 pm
Location: dallas,tx usa
Thanked: 6 times

please explain

by ektamatta » Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:40 am
x_1 = 3
x_2 = 5
x_3 = 9
x_4 = 17


can u plz explain me in detail how u come up with these numbers?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

Re: More than 2 mins again :)

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:09 am
Sure. The question tells us that:

x_1 = 3

It also tells us that when n>1,

x_(n+1) = 2(x_n) – 1

So, to find x_2, we let n=1, and plug into the above:

x_(1+1) = 2(x_1) - 1
x_2 = 2(x_1) - 1

We know that x_1 = 3:

x_2 = 2*3 - 1 = 6-1 = 5

To find x_3, do the same thing, but use n=2:

x_(2+1) = 2(x_2) - 1
x_3 = 2*5 - 1 = 10-1 = 9

Does that make things more clear?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:51 pm
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:99%+

by egybs » Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:35 pm
i just did a the first few and noticed that the sequence is simply f(n)=(2^n)+1

It's easy from there.

Took about 2 min.