BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

More than 2 mins again :)

Expert replies
by netigen » Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:54 pm
It's taking me more than two mins to solve this, any shortcuts?

If the sequence x1, x2, x3, …, xn, … is such that x1 = 3 and x(n+1) = 2(xn) – 1 for n > 1, then x20 – x19 =

A. 2^19
B. 2^20
C. 2^21
D. (2^20) - 1
E. (2^21) - 1
Last edited by netigen on Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by getneonow » Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:28 am
Cannot read the question properly. Some symbols are missing.

Can you repost it again?

Neo
MBA : My passion and My pursuit
Join the discussion

Re: More than 2 mins again :)

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:06 am
netigen wrote: If the sequence x1, x2, x3, …, xn, … is such that x1 = 3 and x(n+1) = 2(xn) – 1 for n = 1, then x20 – x19 =
The part I've bolded: I'm sure you mean for n>1.

With any sequence question, I think it's a good idea to write down the first three or four terms, at least. It's normally very fast to do, and if a pattern emerges, you'll be more likely to see it. Here we have:

x_1 = 3
x_2 = 5
x_3 = 9
x_4 = 17

The question asks about the difference of consecutive terms, so look there for a pattern:
x_2 - x_1 = 5 - 3 = 2^1
x_3 - x_2 = 9 - 5 = 2^2
x_4 - x_3 = 17 - 9 = 2^3

From there, it's reasonable to predict that:
x_(n+1) - x_n = 2^n
x_20 - x_19 = 2^19

That's not what a mathematician would consider an airtight proof- we've just recognized a pattern, and guessed it will continue forever. But it does give the right answer, and normally will on the GMAT.

We can certainly do this more rigourously. Again, if we write the first terms down:

x_1 = 3
x_2 = 5
x_3 = 9
x_4 = 17

we notice that, for 1 <= n <= 4, x_n = 2^n + 1. Will all the terms be in this form?

Using the definition of x_(n+1), if x_n = 2^n + 1, then:

x_(n+1) = 2x_n - 1 = 2(2^n + 1) -1 = 2^(n+1) + 1

So if one term is in this form, every term that follows must also be in this form- indeed for every term, x_n = 2^n + 1.

Then
x_20 - x_19 = 2^20 + 1 - (2^19 + 1) = 2^20 - 2^19 = 2^19.

There are quite a few other ways to get to the answer here, though I'm not seeing a '15 second' solution. There may well be one, however.
Join the discussion

by aatech » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:28 am
Mine approach is same as Ian's
Join the discussion

please explain

by ektamatta » Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:40 am
x_1 = 3
x_2 = 5
x_3 = 9
x_4 = 17


can u plz explain me in detail how u come up with these numbers?
Join the discussion

Re: More than 2 mins again :)

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:09 am
Sure. The question tells us that:

x_1 = 3

It also tells us that when n>1,

x_(n+1) = 2(x_n) – 1

So, to find x_2, we let n=1, and plug into the above:

x_(1+1) = 2(x_1) - 1
x_2 = 2(x_1) - 1

We know that x_1 = 3:

x_2 = 2*3 - 1 = 6-1 = 5

To find x_3, do the same thing, but use n=2:

x_(2+1) = 2(x_2) - 1
x_3 = 2*5 - 1 = 10-1 = 9

Does that make things more clear?
Join the discussion

by egybs » Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:35 pm
i just did a the first few and noticed that the sequence is simply f(n)=(2^n)+1

It's easy from there.

Took about 2 min.
Join the discussion