BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Three digit number

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:58 am
A child selected a three-digit number, XYZ, where X, Y and Z denote the digits
of the number and X + Y + Z= 10. If no two of the three digits were equal,
what was the three-digit number?
(1) X < Y < Z
(2) The three-digit number selected was even.
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by joiedevivre » Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:10 am
X + Y + Z= 10.

(1) X < Y < Z

0 < 4 < 6
2 < 3 < 5
-2 < 4 < 8

in all the above cases x + y + z = 10

Not sufficient.


(2) The three-digit number selected was even.

0 < 4 < 6
-2 < 4 < 8

Not Sufficient.

Both 1 and 2 taken together will also gives multiple even number choices.

Hence Ans is E

Please let me know if my assumption is wrong.
Join the discussion

by kstv » Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:15 am
ssgmatter wrote:A child selected a three-digit number, XYZ, where X, Y and Z denote the digits
of the number and X + Y + Z= 10. If no two of the three digits were equal,
what was the three-digit number?
(1) X < Y < Z
(2) The three-digit number selected was even.
(1) x< y< z can be 1 +2+7, 2+3+5 different sets of three nos. Not suff
(2) 3 even nos can be only 2+2+6 or 2+4+4 = 10
but 2 nos are repeated.
Unless it is 0+4+6 or 0+2+8
but zero is neither even nor odd.
Isn't the Q flawed.
Join the discussion

by neonite » Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:37 am
Ans should be C

Taking both together the only number that satisfies the 2 conditions is 136
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:44 am
kstv wrote:
ssgmatter wrote:A child selected a three-digit number, XYZ, where X, Y and Z denote the digits
of the number and X + Y + Z= 10. If no two of the three digits were equal,
what was the three-digit number?
(1) X < Y < Z
(2) The three-digit number selected was even.
(1) x< y< z can be 1 +2+7, 2+3+5 different sets of three nos. Not suff
(2) 3 even nos can be only 2+2+6 or 2+4+4 = 10
but 2 nos are repeated.
Unless it is 0+4+6 or 0+2+8
but zero is neither even nor odd.
Isn't the Q flawed.
E is correct !

0 is even....I think u made the same mistake in April...and stuart corrected u bhai
Join the discussion

by kartheekchoudhary » Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:57 am
STMT 1:

X < Y < Z

1 < 3 < 6
1 < 2< 7

in all the above cases x + y + z = 10

Not sufficient

STMT 2:


Number z is even so

z can be 0,2,4,6,8

2 0 8
4 0 6

in all the above cases x + y + z = 10

Not sufficient


Taking both together


Number z is even so

z can be 0,2,4,6,8

when z= 8 x,y should be 1,1(all the three are not distinct) or 0 and 1 (x<y<z so X should be 0 but then it can't be three digit number) Wrong

z= 6

possible values for x,y = 1,3 or 0, 4 (wrong ) above stated reason

z= 4 (wrong ) above stated reason

possible values for x,y = 2,4 or 3,3



so ans is c
raja
Join the discussion

by DeepthiRajan » Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:57 am
Hi

I checked to see if there are any answers to this question on other forums and found one that was discussed on manhattan gmat, the ans is E , however, the ques is slightly different from the one discussed here:
"A child selected a three-digit number, XYZ, where X, Y, and Z denote the digits of the number. If no two of the three digits were equal, what was the three-digit number?
(1) The sum of the digits was 10.
(2) X < Y < Z"

But the ques posted here mentions in (2) that the number is even and combining post statements, the only three digit number that satisfies both conditions is 136 (already noted by a previous poster). IMO answer should be C.

HTH
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:55 am
Answer should be C - 136 will be the 3 digit number.

One more mistake I observed in previous posts is that they have taken x as 0
x cannnot be 0 bcos xyz is a 3 digit number.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:06 pm
(1) alone is insufficient as XYZ can be 127 or 136 (for example).

(2) alone is insufficient as XYZ can be 712 or 136.

(1) + (2):

As kvcpk points out, X can't be 0 because then XYZ would be a 2-digit number. So, the smallest x can be is 1. We can't make X too large (in fact, X must be 1), because we need each of Y and Z to be larger, and the sum is only 10. You can quickly pick numbers or use odd/even sum rules to conclude that the only permutation that works is 136.

Choose C.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by jube » Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:41 am
1) It can be 127 or 235 for example - insuff.
2) _ _ 2/4/6/8
Now the last digit can't be 8 since x+y cannot be 2 (since they are distinct digits). It can be 136 or 316 or 514 etc etc. - insuff.

1&2: no. can't be anything other than 136

Hence, C
Join the discussion