BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Three Alegbra Problems

Expert replies

by Night reader » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:55 pm
@garuhape: finally, third and last question :) I got A

Is x/12>y/40 ?

12=2^2 *3; 40=2^3 *5; [(2^3) * 3*5]= 120
x/12 - y/40 >0; (10x-3y)/120 >0 OR 10x-3y>0 ? <--- this is our question as of now
st(1) 10x<3y-6 --> 10x-3y<-6 Sufficient, as it's clear that 10x-3y<0
st(2) 12x-7>4y --> 12x-4y>7 OR 4(3x-y)>7, 3*(3x-y)>3*(7/4), 9x-3y>21/4 <--- this expression can be -ve Only if x>21/4 But we don't know by how much x should be larger -Not Sufficient

IOM A
garuhape wrote: 3. Is x/12>y/40 ?
10x < 3y -6
12x - 7 > 4y[/b]
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Mon Mar 14, 2011 1:59 pm
no-no clock, I answer only x=-3; and x=1.5 two critical points within set. They keep inequality condition. Intervals are not precise. I would agree on math mistake if the solution intervals were found, BUT here's only set with two critical points - believe or not // agree?
clock60 wrote:@ night reader
may be it is better to put aside this
it closer to the truth, but probably you commit math mistake, you answer -3<x<1.5. as i see
try x=1.45
3*1.45-2=2,35
|2*1.45-5|=|-2.1|=2.1
2.35>2,1 not true
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:15 pm
@ reader i agree but only partly, my answer to this, is that x(-3;1,4 (7/5)) including -3, and 1,4, within this interval any given x will result in proper inequility, out of this range not.
but in your answer x=1.5 does not fit inequality, try to insert x=1.45, or x=1.5 as i did in previous post and you see that it is not needed range, that is why i think that it is your math mistake somewhere
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:44 pm
you are correct, math mistake
I need to get full 48 hours sleep before my GMAT in two weeks, otherwise I will mark my score to the hell ...
finally it's x E {-3;1.4} the miscalculation was after discriminant section
clock60 wrote:@ reader i agree but only partly, my answer to this, is that x(-3;1,4 (7/5)) including -3, and 1,4, within this interval any given x will result in proper inequility, out of this range not.
but in your answer x=1.5 does not fit inequality, try to insert x=1.45, or x=1.5 as i did in previous post and you see that it is not needed range, that is why i think that it is your math mistake somewhere
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:22 pm
1. Find the solution set for the following inequality |3x - 2| ≤ |2x - 5|?
Alternate Approach :
I am sure most of you are quite comfortable with drawing the line : y = |x| {If you are not, it is simply y=x for x>=0, and y=-x, for x<0}

Using this approach, as shown in the diagram we have to just solve two equations :
1) For point "A" : 3x-2 = -(2x-5) => x =7/5
2) For point "B" : -(3x-2) = -(2x-5) => x = -3

The values of x which lie between A and B is the solution set : -3 ≤ x ≤7/5

[Note : Please note that while drawing the lines, it helps to consider that the slopes for the lines |3x-2| (which is 3) are more than that of the lines |2x-5| (which is 2). This help us to understand that there is a point "B" which is the intersection point of the two lines. If the slope of the lines were equal the two lines would never meet and if the slopes were in opposite order, the two lines would intersect in another way (clearly not as "B")]
Image
[/img]
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion