BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Thoreau stood by his principles and went to jail, instead of

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members
Thoreau stood by his principles and, going to jail, instead of paying taxes supporting the Mexican-American War that he felt was unjust.
(A) Thoreau stood by his principles and, going to jail, instead of paying taxes supporting the Mexican-American War that he felt was unjust.
(B) Standing by his principles and going to jail, rather than paying taxes, Thoreau felt the Mexican-American War to be unjust.
(C) Thoreau did not pay taxes supporting the Mexican-American War because he felt it was unjust; instead, he stood by his principles and went to jail.
(D) Feeling the Mexican-American War was unjust, Thoreau, instead of paying taxes, stood by his principles and went to jail, because they supported it.
(E) Rather than paying taxes supporting the Mexican-American War, Thoreau, standing by his principles and going to jail, felt it as unjust.


Diction is one of the eight major area on the GMAT SC. For a discussion of this important topic, as well as the OA & OE of this question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/more-on-diction/

Mike :-)
Last edited by Mike@Magoosh on Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:19 am

by appy_fizz » Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:58 am
First of all thanks a ton Mike for sharing such beautiful concepts. I have one small query regarding the stand alone nouns. The usage of stand alone noun "Thoreau" in 4 and 5 option is incorrect or correct?

Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:14 members

by aditya8062 » Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:40 am
The usage of stand alone noun "Thoreau" in 4 and 5 option is incorrect or correct?
why do feel that it is stand alone? you can read it as bold:

D says: Feeling the Mexican-American War was unjust, Thoreau, instead of paying taxes, stood by his principles and went to jail, because they supported it.

E says: Rather than paying taxes supporting the Mexican-American War, Thoreau, standing by his principles and going to jail, felt it as unjust


i agree that D and E are wrong for other reason but if u contending that D and E are fragment then i suppose that is not the case ----->the subject "Thoreau" is very much having its "verb" hence it is OK grammar wise

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:57 am
appy_fizz wrote:First of all thanks a ton Mike for sharing such beautiful concepts. I have one small query regarding the stand alone nouns. The usage of stand alone noun "Thoreau" in 4 and 5 option is incorrect or correct?
Dear appy_fizz,
It appears that aditya8062 already provided an excellent answer. I just wanted to check to make sure everything is clear.

It is 100% true that truly stand-alone nouns, nouns not connected to anything else, are always wrong. It's also true that just because a noun is not obviously connected to anything right next to it doesn't mean it's stand-alone ---- the GMAT loves the [noun][noun modifier][verb] structure that I used here. The stand-alone noun does appear in the double-subject mistake:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/915-the ... ct-mistake

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

• Page 1 of 1