BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Groups

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 11:37 am
Location: kolkata

by ssbhowmick » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:31 pm
I think it is A..

If the number of spending bill for X is less than Y but the sum of the amount of each bill for X exceeds Y (no matter how much tax payer money is involved), then the calculation will be wrong. .

Not sure whether I am right or not.. !!
Peace
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:41 pm
IMO B

I am not sure If I understood the question correctly.

My guess would be B, since if we take B into effect, number of members in X or Y would alter the result.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:28 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by arorag » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:52 pm
To me C is more appropriate... As all the bills are going to pass anyways then allegation of more spending of tax payer money is useless
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:57 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:720

by gmat_dest » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:17 pm
Conclusion:

Congressional members of X authorize more spending of tax payer's dollars than members of part Y.

Premise:

More spending bills were passed.

Assumption: The fewer spending bills of Y dont spend more taxpayers' dollars then the more spending bills of X.

Answer choice A handles this.

Hence A.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:35 am
OA - A
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:38 pm
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1