BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The wholesale cost of asbestos

Expert replies
by kvcpk » Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:53 am
The wholesale cost of asbestos, used in the manufacture of fire-retardant asbestos shorts, has seen a significant reduction in the past year, unlike that of its substitute, raw wire mesh. Thus, while asbestos shorts stores' retail prices have yet to fall, they will certainly do so eventually.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens this argument?

A. The weaving costs for asbestos cloth rose in the past year.
B. The gross wholesale price for untreated asbestos is usually more than the same volume of untreated wire mesh.
C. The average store specializing in retail sale of asbestos shorts has seen its operating costs remain unchanged in the past year.
D. Retail price changes always lag behind wholesale price changes.
E. Asbestos manufacturing costs increased in the past year.

OA Later
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by beatthegmatinsept » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:00 am
IMO C.
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Join the discussion

by SeemaSkl » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:07 pm
Argument says retail price of finished product will decrease because cost of raw material decreased. If some other cost component increases, this argument can be weakened. 'A' talks about weaving costs that rose. This will weaken the conclusion that retail prices will fall.

So IMO A.
Join the discussion

by beatthegmatinsept » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:23 pm
kvcpk wrote:The wholesale cost of asbestos, used in the manufacture of fire-retardant asbestos shorts, has seen a significant reduction in the past year, unlike that of its substitute, raw wire mesh. Thus, while asbestos shorts stores' retail prices have yet to fall, they will certainly do so eventually.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens this argument?

A. The weaving costs for asbestos cloth rose in the past year.
B. The gross wholesale price for untreated asbestos is usually more than the same volume of untreated wire mesh.
C. The average store specializing in retail sale of asbestos shorts has seen its operating costs remain unchanged in the past year.
D. Retail price changes always lag behind wholesale price changes.
E. Asbestos manufacturing costs increased in the past year.

OA Later
[spoiler]The arguement says that asbestos shorts stores' retail prices will certainly fall eventually.
I chose C because it states that an avg retail sale store has not seen its operating costs change over the past one year. While the premise says that over the past 1 year wholesale cost of asbestos is decreasing, Choice C basically shows that the decreasing cost of asbestos has not resulted in a decrease in their operating costs.[/spoiler]
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Join the discussion

by 007.r.mason » Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:40 pm
IMO A as well. That is the only argument that is in the scope of the passage.. only accountants know what operating costs really are....
Aim high!!
Achieve excellence!!
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:52 pm
OA is A
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by debmalya_dutta » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:06 pm
my pick is A
though the raw material cost has fallen, an increase in weaving costs would mean no fall in the final prices of the shorts
@Deb
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:26 am
kvcpk wrote:The wholesale cost of asbestos, used in the manufacture of fire-retardant asbestos shorts, has seen a significant reduction in the past year, unlike that of its substitute, raw wire mesh. Thus, while asbestos shorts stores' retail prices have yet to fall, they will certainly do so eventually.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens this argument?

A. The weaving costs for asbestos cloth rose in the past year.
B. The gross wholesale price for untreated asbestos is usually more than the same volume of untreated wire mesh.
C. The average store specializing in retail sale of asbestos shorts has seen its operating costs remain unchanged in the past year.
D. Retail price changes always lag behind wholesale price changes.
E. Asbestos manufacturing costs increased in the past year.

OA Later
It is A.

The author leaves big gaps to be attacked.

RAW asbestos ---> asbestos fabric-------> retails sells

Raw material cost has gone down does not mean that the manufacturing cost had also gone down.

A anti fill the gap.
Join the discussion