BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The wholesale cost of asbestos

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times
by kvcpk » Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:53 am
The wholesale cost of asbestos, used in the manufacture of fire-retardant asbestos shorts, has seen a significant reduction in the past year, unlike that of its substitute, raw wire mesh. Thus, while asbestos shorts stores' retail prices have yet to fall, they will certainly do so eventually.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens this argument?

A. The weaving costs for asbestos cloth rose in the past year.
B. The gross wholesale price for untreated asbestos is usually more than the same volume of untreated wire mesh.
C. The average store specializing in retail sale of asbestos shorts has seen its operating costs remain unchanged in the past year.
D. Retail price changes always lag behind wholesale price changes.
E. Asbestos manufacturing costs increased in the past year.

OA Later
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 22 times
GMAT Score:680

by beatthegmatinsept » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:00 am
IMO C.
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:33 am

by SeemaSkl » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:07 pm
Argument says retail price of finished product will decrease because cost of raw material decreased. If some other cost component increases, this argument can be weakened. 'A' talks about weaving costs that rose. This will weaken the conclusion that retail prices will fall.

So IMO A.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 22 times
GMAT Score:680

by beatthegmatinsept » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:23 pm
kvcpk wrote:The wholesale cost of asbestos, used in the manufacture of fire-retardant asbestos shorts, has seen a significant reduction in the past year, unlike that of its substitute, raw wire mesh. Thus, while asbestos shorts stores' retail prices have yet to fall, they will certainly do so eventually.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens this argument?

A. The weaving costs for asbestos cloth rose in the past year.
B. The gross wholesale price for untreated asbestos is usually more than the same volume of untreated wire mesh.
C. The average store specializing in retail sale of asbestos shorts has seen its operating costs remain unchanged in the past year.
D. Retail price changes always lag behind wholesale price changes.
E. Asbestos manufacturing costs increased in the past year.

OA Later
[spoiler]The arguement says that asbestos shorts stores' retail prices will certainly fall eventually.
I chose C because it states that an avg retail sale store has not seen its operating costs change over the past one year. While the premise says that over the past 1 year wholesale cost of asbestos is decreasing, Choice C basically shows that the decreasing cost of asbestos has not resulted in a decrease in their operating costs.[/spoiler]
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:730

by 007.r.mason » Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:40 pm
IMO A as well. That is the only argument that is in the scope of the passage.. only accountants know what operating costs really are....
Aim high!!
Achieve excellence!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times

by kvcpk » Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:52 pm
OA is A
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 29 times
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:06 pm
my pick is A
though the raw material cost has fallen, an increase in weaving costs would mean no fall in the final prices of the shorts
@Deb
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 31 times

by FightWithGMAT » Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:26 am
kvcpk wrote:The wholesale cost of asbestos, used in the manufacture of fire-retardant asbestos shorts, has seen a significant reduction in the past year, unlike that of its substitute, raw wire mesh. Thus, while asbestos shorts stores' retail prices have yet to fall, they will certainly do so eventually.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens this argument?

A. The weaving costs for asbestos cloth rose in the past year.
B. The gross wholesale price for untreated asbestos is usually more than the same volume of untreated wire mesh.
C. The average store specializing in retail sale of asbestos shorts has seen its operating costs remain unchanged in the past year.
D. Retail price changes always lag behind wholesale price changes.
E. Asbestos manufacturing costs increased in the past year.

OA Later
It is A.

The author leaves big gaps to be attacked.

RAW asbestos ---> asbestos fabric-------> retails sells

Raw material cost has gone down does not mean that the manufacturing cost had also gone down.

A anti fill the gap.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1