BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Moe invested

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 amFollowed by: 80 members
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
GMAT Score:760
by sanju09 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:49 am
Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:00 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 24 times

by neerajkumar1_1 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:14 am
statement 1; n could be 4 and more.. so insufficient...

statement 2: n is definitely greater than 5... so sufficient...

IMO: B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 52 times

by killer1387 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:20 am
sanju09 wrote:Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
imo E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:11 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by klmehta03 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:38 am
My answer is E can we have OA pls?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:11 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by klmehta03 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:39 am
My answer is E can we have OA pls?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 29 times

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:36 pm
sanju09 wrote:Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
i think the answer should be E...
the formular is F=year*interest*the sum of money, so
statement1 n could be any number from 3
statement 2: interest <6500 so the min interest moe could get is 1500 so n should be 6 and 6, n,4..
both is also insufficient
E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:28 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: India
Thanked: 13 times

by spartacus1412 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:03 am
from statement 1 : n >2
from statement 2 : n <6

none of them prove n >4 alone.

when combined 2<n<6.
hence, E.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1