Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
Moe invested
This topic has expert replies
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- neerajkumar1_1
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:00 am
- Thanked: 24 times
- Followed by:2 members
statement 1; n could be 4 and more.. so insufficient...
statement 2: n is definitely greater than 5... so sufficient...
IMO: B
statement 2: n is definitely greater than 5... so sufficient...
IMO: B
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
- Thanked: 52 times
- Followed by:5 members
imo Esanju09 wrote:Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:3 members
i think the answer should be E...sanju09 wrote:Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
the formular is F=year*interest*the sum of money, so
statement1 n could be any number from 3
statement 2: interest <6500 so the min interest moe could get is 1500 so n should be 6 and 6, n,4..
both is also insufficient
E
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:28 pm
- Location: India
- Thanked: 13 times
- Followed by:1 members
from statement 1 : n >2
from statement 2 : n <6
none of them prove n >4 alone.
when combined 2<n<6.
hence, E.
from statement 2 : n <6
none of them prove n >4 alone.
when combined 2<n<6.
hence, E.