The incumbent

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:28 pm
Thanked: 4 times

The incumbent

by arorag » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:35 pm
Each increase of 1 percent in real disposable personal income per capita will increase the share of the electorate for an incumbent by about 2.2 percentage points, other things being equal. Since 1952 there has been a decline in real disposable income during only one presidential election year. The incumbent lost that election.
Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?
(A) When an incumbent runs for office, he or she is likely to win.
(B) Political parties should take care to put forth a candidate who seems prosperous.
(C) Presidential candidates should put their greatest efforts into improving their public image.
(D) Because a presidential campaign requires the expenditure of large amounts of money, it frequently impoverishes a candidate and his or her supporters.
(E) The outcome of a presidential election is substantially affected by factors other than the ideological positions of the candidates.

I got this one right be POE..But need to know reasoning

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:44 pm

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:46 pm

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:04 pm
IMO E

POe for me too..

only e talks about other factors( Spending ) impacting election results...

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:17 pm
IMO : E

E talk about how result of election depend upon factor other the ideological position of candidate.

ideological position of candidate : suggestive win/loose position of candidate.

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 17 times

by pandeyvineet24 » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:00 pm
E.

As mentioned in the passage per capita income and the expenditures decide the outcome of the election.

Therefore E should be the answer which states that factors other than ideological factors (as monetary) decide the outcome of election.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:56 am

by Musicolo » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:46 pm
E is most logical of all.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:51 pm
E seems to be the best bet here....I hope it is correct !!

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:43 am
Whats that Ideological position all about??

Could anyone explain why A is not an option?

Seems we need to ask some GMAT Tutor...

@DanaJ,CRamya(Pioneers in CR !!! :lol: ) Could u plz help us

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:35 am
ya.. what exactly ideological positions of the candidates mean?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:54 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by DarkKnight » Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:50 am
I will go with A.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:27 am

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:44 pm
I am leaning more towards A, but I'm not sure about it.