BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The Flight of the Birds

Expert replies
by zaarathelab » Thu Nov 24, 2011 12:30 am
Two opposing scenarios, the "arboreal" hypothesis and
the "cursorial" hypothesis, have traditionally been put
forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The
"arboreal" hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began
to fly by climbing trees and gliding down from
branches with the help of incipient feathers: the height
of trees provides a good starting place for launching
flight, especially through gliding. As feathers became
larger over time, flapping flight evolved and birds
finally became fully air-borne. This hypothesis makes
intuitive sense, but certain aspects are troubling.
Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its
maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously
arboreal adaptations, such as feet fully adapted for
perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, but
no convincing analysis has demonstrated how
Archaeopteryx would have both climbed and flown
with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than
a few meters in the environments where
Archaeopteryx fossils have been found. Even if the
animals could climb trees, this ability is not
synonymous with gliding ability. (Many small animals,
and even some goats and kangaroos, are capable of
climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides,
Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders,
such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and
hind limbs.
The "cursorial" (running) hypothesis holds that small
dinosaurs ran along the ground and stretched out their
arms for balance as they leaped into the air after
insect prey or, perhaps, to avoid predators. Even
rudimentary feathers on forelimbs could have
expanded the arm's surface area to enhance lift
slightly. Larger feathers could have increased lift
incrementally, until sustained flight was gradually
achieved. Of course, a leap into the air does not
provide the acceleration produced by dropping out of a
tree; an animal would have to run quite fast to take
off. Still, some small terrestrial animals can achieve
high speeds. The cursorial hypothesis is strengthened
by the fact that the immediate theropod dinosaur
ancestors of birds were terrestrial, and they had the
traits needed for high lift off speeds: they were small,
agile, lightly built, long-legged, and good runners. And
because they were bipedal, their arms were free to
evolve flapping flight, which cannot be said for other
reptiles of their time.

Which of the following is included in the discussion of
the cursorial hypothesis but not in the discussion of
the arboreal hypothesis?
A. A discussion of some of the features of
Archaeopteryx
B. A description of the environment known to have
been inhabited by bird ancestors
C. A possible reason why bird ancestors might have
been engaging in activities that eventually evolved into
flight
D. A description of the obvious features of animals
with gliding ability
E. An estimate of the amount of time it took for bird
ancestors to evolve the kind of flapping flight that
allowed them to become completely airborne
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

by ranjeet75 » Thu Nov 24, 2011 7:04 am
IMO D
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:02 am
Would go with E on the basis of the following sentence.


"As feathers became larger over time, flapping flight evolved and birds finally became fully air-borne."
Join the discussion

by zaarathelab » Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:17 am
i went with as well. But OA is C

i think the OA is wrong. This is from GMAT sets
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion