BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Church law

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1048
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 amFollowed by: 27 members
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
GMAT Score:670
by arora007 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:17 am
Having been forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle Ages to sire a family.


a) Having been forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle Ages to sire a family.

b) Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

c) Although they were forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle Ages to sire a family.

d) Although a priest was forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for him during the Middle Ages to sire a family.

e) Although they were forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for priests during the Middle Ages to sire families.


source: Cambridge test

[spoiler]OA is E, i got it wrong B, but E is the right answer showing the contrast with 'although' [/spoiler]
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:28 am
Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 173 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:30 am
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
what's the problem with D?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1048
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 amFollowed by: 27 members
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
GMAT Score:670

by arora007 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:37 am
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
I think there is no problem with "it" , otherwise even E would have a problematic...rite??

The problem is with no contrast being present in B, the same is mentioned in the answer explanation.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1048
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 amFollowed by: 27 members
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
GMAT Score:670

by arora007 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:42 am
gmatmachoman wrote:
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
what's the problem with D?
The explanation says..."the fourth choice changes the intended meaning of the original by implying that there was a single priest who sired several families."
I could not understand how the sentence intends that... I would perhaps like some expert to shed light on this!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:25 am
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:620

by madhukumar_v » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:44 am
A,B: Modifier Problem (Who was forbidden)
C: Pronoun problem (they..priest - should be priests)
E: What was unusual for priests - to sire families (was corresponds to families, plural)

So D, Also in D subject starts early (Although a priest..than postponing to the later part of the sentence)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:51 am
Thanked: 2 times

by prosaicblabber » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:46 am
rewrite this sentence as

It was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family,forbidden by Church law to marry.

now Forbidden by Church law to marry doesn't clearly refers to priest . so seems erroneous to me. my 2 cents.
i never have a "TO -DO" list and i end up having a lot of "NOW WAT TO DO ?" lists
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:42 pm
arora007 wrote:
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
I think there is no problem with "it" , otherwise even E would have a problematic...rite??

The problem is with no contrast being present in B, the same is mentioned in the answer explanation.
E does not have a modifier issue.

Some concept here :
Actually there are two ways to remove an opening modifier issue (as in B)

1. Instead of modifier, create a clause. [ E is doing that, here they can refer to priests only ]
2. put the right thing just after the modifier. we can write B as
e.g. Forbidden by Church law to marry, priests ......
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:43 pm
arora007 wrote:
gmatmachoman wrote:
paes wrote:Initially I also selected B.

But actually B has a modifier issue.

Forbidden by Church law to marry, it was not unusual for a priest during the Middle-Ages to sire a family.

only E has no issue.
what's the problem with D?
The explanation says..."the fourth choice changes the intended meaning of the original by implying that there was a single priest who sired several families."
I could not understand how the sentence intends that... I would perhaps like some expert to shed light on this!
D is clearly wrong, with the same reason whatever you have written.
Read it again and you will come to know.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:51 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 62 times
GMAT Score:750

by fitzgerald23 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:52 pm
You can quickly eliminate A & B, because it is ambiguous as to who has been forbidden. Was "it" forbidden or was it the priest?

C can be eliminated because the two dont agree in number. "they were forbidden".... "a priest"

D is eliminated because the meaning changes. "a priest was forbidden" means that the sentence is simply about one specific priest, which is not the intended meaning.

That leaves E. This clears the number issue as it uses "they" and "priests". The use of although is proper here as well.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1