BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

The Economist "Sentence" doubt

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2018 11:25 am

by himalaya savalia » Mon Dec 24, 2018 11:08 pm
It seems correct.
Here we are expressing our objection 'to' something.
So, objection to is correct.
And when you ask 'what' do we object to, you get answer 'having Vladimir Putin's man in the job' , which is a clause.
So, you have to see sentence like ---> object to 'clause'
Hence, the sentence seems correct.
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2018 3:46 am

by pankajpal.iitkgp » Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:31 pm
Thanks a lot. I couldn't comprehend such simple sentence which makes me look stupid after you simplify it effortlessly.
himalaya savalia wrote:It seems correct.
Here we are expressing our objection 'to' something.
So, objection to is correct.
And when you ask 'what' do we object to, you get answer 'having Vladimir Putin's man in the job' , which is a clause.
So, you have to see sentence like ---> object to 'clause'
Hence, the sentence seems correct.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1