The adopted use of trained fighter horses, which some historians date around a specific era thousands of years ago, was a critical element to the flourishment many civilizations including the Ottoman Empire.
(A) The adopted use of trained fighter horses, which some historians date
(B) The adopted use of trained fighter horses, which some historians have thought to occur
(C) Adopting the use of trained fighter horses, dated by some historians at
(D) The adoption of using trained fighter horses, thought by some historians to have occurred
(E) The trained fighter horse's adopted use, dated by some historians to have been
Target Test Prep is 20% off right now!
Use code FLASH20
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
The adopted use of trained fighter horses, which some
This topic has expert replies
-
BTGmoderatorDC
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Now, we have to look at the options very clearly in order to ensure we pick the best of the options.
Option A - INCORRECT.
This option presents us with no meaningful contribution to the subject matter because it doesn't bring up any other intuition aside just copying from the question.
Option B - INCORRECT
This option meant to explain the same line of meaning which isn't clearly what we need. We need to speak with one voice although using different languages. Instead of the sentences here we should have had something like ''which some historians thought to have occurred'', take note of the past tense use of ''occur'' because it happened in the past.
In Option C - INCORRECT.
Here, using a continuous form of the verb ''adopt'' is wrong. You can only continue with what's happening in the present terms not what has happened in the past in linguistic sense though. Clearly not correct.
In Option D - CORRECT.
This statement is specific and affirmative. The verb ''adopt'' has been nominalised here, i.e it has become a noun, which is good for a logical change of how the sentence has been written though still retaining the meaning. The corrections made to Option Bcould be noticed here, ''occur'' has become ''occurred''.
In Option E - INCORRECT.
This statement is though a correct option but it's not easily comprehensible. Logic needed to explain it. It can't be easily explained to a layman.
Option A - INCORRECT.
This option presents us with no meaningful contribution to the subject matter because it doesn't bring up any other intuition aside just copying from the question.
Option B - INCORRECT
This option meant to explain the same line of meaning which isn't clearly what we need. We need to speak with one voice although using different languages. Instead of the sentences here we should have had something like ''which some historians thought to have occurred'', take note of the past tense use of ''occur'' because it happened in the past.
In Option C - INCORRECT.
Here, using a continuous form of the verb ''adopt'' is wrong. You can only continue with what's happening in the present terms not what has happened in the past in linguistic sense though. Clearly not correct.
In Option D - CORRECT.
This statement is specific and affirmative. The verb ''adopt'' has been nominalised here, i.e it has become a noun, which is good for a logical change of how the sentence has been written though still retaining the meaning. The corrections made to Option Bcould be noticed here, ''occur'' has become ''occurred''.
In Option E - INCORRECT.
This statement is though a correct option but it's not easily comprehensible. Logic needed to explain it. It can't be easily explained to a layman.
