BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

The Economist "Sentence" doubt

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
Expert replies
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |

by himalaya savalia » Mon Dec 24, 2018 11:08 pm
It seems correct.
Here we are expressing our objection 'to' something.
So, objection to is correct.
And when you ask 'what' do we object to, you get answer 'having Vladimir Putin's man in the job' , which is a clause.
So, you have to see sentence like ---> object to 'clause'
Hence, the sentence seems correct.
Join the discussion

by pankajpal.iitkgp » Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:31 pm
Thanks a lot. I couldn't comprehend such simple sentence which makes me look stupid after you simplify it effortlessly.
himalaya savalia wrote:It seems correct.
Here we are expressing our objection 'to' something.
So, objection to is correct.
And when you ask 'what' do we object to, you get answer 'having Vladimir Putin's man in the job' , which is a clause.
So, you have to see sentence like ---> object to 'clause'
Hence, the sentence seems correct.
Join the discussion