BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is

Expert replies
by neerajkumar1_1 » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:30 pm
That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked
thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the
Second World War, the very fact that there were
nuclear armaments in existence has kept major
powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of
starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would
make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable.
The proof is that a third world war between
superpowers has not happened.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw
in the argument?

(A) Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments
represents a significant drain on a
country's economy.

(B) From what has happened in the past, it is
impossible to infer with certainty what will
happen in the future, so an accident could still
trigger a third world war between
superpowers.

(C) Continuing to produce nuclear weapons
beyond the minimum needed for deterrence
increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.

(D) The major powers have engaged in many
smaller-scale military operations since the
end of the Second World War, while refraining
from a nuclear confrontation.

(E) It cannot be known whether it was nuclear
deterrence that worked, or some other factor,
such as a recognition of the economic value
of remaining at peace.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by martin.jonson007 » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:05 am
E is correct...

C is tempting but we can't consider it.. b'coz argument has nothing to do wid future events.... out of scope...

Gud ques..
Join the discussion

by jube » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:22 am
E

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by neerajkumar1_1 » Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:20 am
I was confused between C and E

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:18 am
the author says that "policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable" because due to nuclear wepaons threat no 3rd world was has happened. any point that gives another point for not happening the war should be the answer. hence E

a.out of scope
b.this talks abt future possibilty
c. again a prediction
d. agreed,but why 3rd world was has not happened.this supprots the author stateemnt that it is becasue of nuclear weapons
e.this gives anothe reason "economic value" for avoiding war
neerajkumar1_1 wrote:That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked
thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the
Second World War, the very fact that there were
nuclear armaments in existence has kept major
powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of
starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would
make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable.
The proof is that a third world war between
superpowers has not happened.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw
in the argument?

(A) Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments
represents a significant drain on a
country's economy.

(B) From what has happened in the past, it is
impossible to infer with certainty what will
happen in the future, so an accident could still
trigger a third world war between
superpowers.

(C) Continuing to produce nuclear weapons
beyond the minimum needed for deterrence
increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.

(D) The major powers have engaged in many
smaller-scale military operations since the
end of the Second World War, while refraining
from a nuclear confrontation.

(E) It cannot be known whether it was nuclear
deterrence that worked, or some other factor,
such as a recognition of the economic value
of remaining at peace.
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by missionGMAT007 » Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:25 am
IMO E
Join the discussion