BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is

Expert replies
by neerajkumar1_1 » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:30 pm
That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked
thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the
Second World War, the very fact that there were
nuclear armaments in existence has kept major
powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of
starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would
make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable.
The proof is that a third world war between
superpowers has not happened.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw
in the argument?

(A) Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments
represents a significant drain on a
country's economy.

(B) From what has happened in the past, it is
impossible to infer with certainty what will
happen in the future, so an accident could still
trigger a third world war between
superpowers.

(C) Continuing to produce nuclear weapons
beyond the minimum needed for deterrence
increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.

(D) The major powers have engaged in many
smaller-scale military operations since the
end of the Second World War, while refraining
from a nuclear confrontation.

(E) It cannot be known whether it was nuclear
deterrence that worked, or some other factor,
such as a recognition of the economic value
of remaining at peace.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by martin.jonson007 » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:05 am
E is correct...

C is tempting but we can't consider it.. b'coz argument has nothing to do wid future events.... out of scope...

Gud ques..
Join the discussion

by jube » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:22 am
E

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by neerajkumar1_1 » Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:20 am
I was confused between C and E

[spoiler]OA:E[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:18 am
the author says that "policy of nuclear deterrence has worked thus far is unquestionable" because due to nuclear wepaons threat no 3rd world was has happened. any point that gives another point for not happening the war should be the answer. hence E

a.out of scope
b.this talks abt future possibilty
c. again a prediction
d. agreed,but why 3rd world was has not happened.this supprots the author stateemnt that it is becasue of nuclear weapons
e.this gives anothe reason "economic value" for avoiding war
neerajkumar1_1 wrote:That the policy of nuclear deterrence has worked
thus far is unquestionable. Since the end of the
Second World War, the very fact that there were
nuclear armaments in existence has kept major
powers from using nuclear weapons, for fear of
starting a worldwide nuclear exchange that would
make the land of the power initiating it uninhabitable.
The proof is that a third world war between
superpowers has not happened.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates a flaw
in the argument?

(A) Maintaining a high level of nuclear armaments
represents a significant drain on a
country's economy.

(B) From what has happened in the past, it is
impossible to infer with certainty what will
happen in the future, so an accident could still
trigger a third world war between
superpowers.

(C) Continuing to produce nuclear weapons
beyond the minimum needed for deterrence
increases the likelihood of a nuclear accident.

(D) The major powers have engaged in many
smaller-scale military operations since the
end of the Second World War, while refraining
from a nuclear confrontation.

(E) It cannot be known whether it was nuclear
deterrence that worked, or some other factor,
such as a recognition of the economic value
of remaining at peace.
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by missionGMAT007 » Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:25 am
IMO E
Join the discussion