BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Terminating Decimal

Expert replies
by rish » Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:02 pm
Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 36, 0.72, and 3.005 are terminating decimals.
If a, b, c, d and e are integers and p = 2^a3^b and q = 2^c3^d5^e, is p/q a terminating decimal?



(1) a > c
(2) b > d
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shanrizvi » Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:55 am
The best way to do this is by picking numbers.

Is p/q = (2^a.3^b)/(2^c.3^d.5^e) a terminal decimal?

e=1

Statement 1: a>c

a=4, c=3

b=2, d=2

p/q = 2/5 (terminating decimal)

Lets pick different values for b and d. b=3, d=4

p/q = 2/15 (not a terminating decimal)

Hence, statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement 2: b>d

b=4, d=3

a=2, b=2

p/q = 3/5 (terminating decimal)

lets take a=2, b=3

p/q = 3/10 (terminating decimal)

Statement 2 is sufficient. Answer: B!
Join the discussion

by rish » Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:59 am
shanrizvi wrote:The best way to do this is by picking numbers.

Is p/q = (2^a.3^b)/(2^c.3^d.5^e) a terminal decimal?

e=1

Statement 1: a>c

a=4, c=3

b=2, d=2

p/q = 2/5 (terminating decimal)

Lets pick different values for b and d. b=3, d=4

p/q = 2/15 (not a terminating decimal)

Hence, statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement 2: b>d

b=4, d=3

a=2, b=2

p/q = 3/5 (terminating decimal)

lets take a=2, b=3

p/q = 3/10 (terminating decimal)

Statement 2 is sufficient. Answer: B!
can you prove this by picking negative numbers ?
eg b=-2, d=-3
Join the discussion

by srivas » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:47 am
why e should be one [e =1]
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by srivas » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:47 am
why e should be one [e =1]
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by srivas » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:48 am
why e should be one [e =1]
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:32 am
Ans is B IMO.


stmt # 1: a > c Irrespective of whether a > c or a < c, any power of 2 would result in a terminating decimal. Same goes with powers of 5. Since we have powers of 3 in the expression, which can yield a non-terminating decimial, hence stmt #1 is NOT SUFFICIENT.

stmt # 2: b > d => Whether the expression is terminating or not depends on what (b-d) evaulates to. Three possible cases exist for (b-d)

b +ve d +ve => (b-d) +ve (since b > d)
Hence expression is terminating.

b +ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = b+|d|)
Hence expression is terminating.

b -ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = |d|-|b| &&
|d| > |b|)
Hence expression is terminating.

Hence stmt # 2 is SUFFICIENT.

Answer is B
Join the discussion

by rish » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:50 am
sreak1089 wrote:Ans is B IMO.


stmt # 1: a > c Irrespective of whether a > c or a < c, any power of 2 would result in a terminating decimal. Same goes with powers of 5. Since we have powers of 3 in the expression, which can yield a non-terminating decimial, hence stmt #1 is NOT SUFFICIENT.

stmt # 2: b > d => Whether the expression is terminating or not depends on what (b-d) evaulates to. Three possible cases exist for (b-d)

b +ve d +ve => (b-d) +ve (since b > d)
Hence expression is terminating.

b +ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = b+|d|)
Hence expression is terminating.

b -ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = |d|-|b| &&
|d| > |b|)
Hence expression is terminating.

Hence stmt # 2 is SUFFICIENT.

Answer is B
Thnx for explaining the case when b,d are negative. It helps.

B is the OA.
Join the discussion

by chipbmk » Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:14 am
Thnx for explaining the case when b,d are negative. It helps.

B is the OA.[/quote]

I just got this problem on a practice test and just FYI, the question stem says "a,b,c,d,e are non-negative integers"

Therefore, there is no need to explain the negative for B,D.
Join the discussion