BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily

Expert replies
by AAPL » Wed Apr 24, 2019 4:54 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Princeton Review

Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily since 1981, averaging 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit warmer north of the 46th parallel than in the previous decade. Precipitation and water-table levels, which have historically maintained a measurable relationship to each other (within a scaled range of two to four points), have varied drastically from 1987 to 1991, sometimes deviating as much as six points in fewer than eight months. Reports from Canada indicate a similar median temperature increase, estimated at 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit; research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points.

Of the following, which conclusion is best supported by the evidence above?

A. The higher the temperature of a given area, the more likely it is that the water levels will vary.
B. The variation in temperature in the last decade has been less than the fluctuation of moisture.
C. When temperatures rise north of the 46th parallel, natural water exchange between land and atmosphere must change in the same proportion.
D. Within the last ten years, water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the Pacific Northwest than they have in Canada.
E. Canada will have more stability in weather than will the area of the United States above the 46th parallel.

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:44 am
OPTION A - INCORRECT
This also seems like a good conclusion to the argument, but the rate at which the water level varies is different at the span of some years and location. So, the given information here is not detailed enough to serve as a conclusion to the argument.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
It is true that the variation of temperature has been lesser than the fluctuation of moisture but this given conclusion is stereotypical in nature.
It is only concerned about the rate of temperature to moisture, not the location and the years involved which makes it not best supported by the argument.

OPTION C - INCORRECT
This cannot serve as a conclusion to the argument because it is not the point to be proved with this argument. The argument isn't just about the rise in temperature in the 46th parallel but also in Canada which has similar reports

OPTION D - CORRECT
Within the last years which is between 1987 to 1991 as stated in the argument, the water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the pacific Northwest than they have in Canada. With adequate evidence in the argument that claims that the pacific Northwest precipitation can vary as much as six points unlike Canada which is no more than three points.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
The argument here is not about comparing locations with stable weather. So, this cannot serve as a conclusion to the argument.
Join the discussion