BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily

Expert replies
by AAPL » Wed Apr 24, 2019 4:54 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Princeton Review

Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily since 1981, averaging 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit warmer north of the 46th parallel than in the previous decade. Precipitation and water-table levels, which have historically maintained a measurable relationship to each other (within a scaled range of two to four points), have varied drastically from 1987 to 1991, sometimes deviating as much as six points in fewer than eight months. Reports from Canada indicate a similar median temperature increase, estimated at 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit; research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points.

Of the following, which conclusion is best supported by the evidence above?

A. The higher the temperature of a given area, the more likely it is that the water levels will vary.
B. The variation in temperature in the last decade has been less than the fluctuation of moisture.
C. When temperatures rise north of the 46th parallel, natural water exchange between land and atmosphere must change in the same proportion.
D. Within the last ten years, water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the Pacific Northwest than they have in Canada.
E. Canada will have more stability in weather than will the area of the United States above the 46th parallel.

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:44 am
OPTION A - INCORRECT
This also seems like a good conclusion to the argument, but the rate at which the water level varies is different at the span of some years and location. So, the given information here is not detailed enough to serve as a conclusion to the argument.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
It is true that the variation of temperature has been lesser than the fluctuation of moisture but this given conclusion is stereotypical in nature.
It is only concerned about the rate of temperature to moisture, not the location and the years involved which makes it not best supported by the argument.

OPTION C - INCORRECT
This cannot serve as a conclusion to the argument because it is not the point to be proved with this argument. The argument isn't just about the rise in temperature in the 46th parallel but also in Canada which has similar reports

OPTION D - CORRECT
Within the last years which is between 1987 to 1991 as stated in the argument, the water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the pacific Northwest than they have in Canada. With adequate evidence in the argument that claims that the pacific Northwest precipitation can vary as much as six points unlike Canada which is no more than three points.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
The argument here is not about comparing locations with stable weather. So, this cannot serve as a conclusion to the argument.
Join the discussion