BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Teacher and applications

Expert replies

by akahuja143 » Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:38 pm
Again a nice breakdown Testluv IMO E is the best answer
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:42 am
Testluv wrote:
That's pretty unlikely.

I think that this is a bad question, and I wonder what the source is.
Source is GMATprep and I wonder if we can have such flaws in GMATprep questions
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:05 am
iamcste wrote:
Testluv wrote:
That's pretty unlikely.

I think that this is a bad question, and I wonder what the source is.
Source is GMATprep and I wonder if we can have such flaws in GMATprep questions
Remember, your job is not to look for a perfect explanation. How would a drop in applications lead to a shortage of teachers? It would do so only if the number of teaching positions to be filled exceeded the number of applications from qualified candidates. E indicates that this may not be the case.

Similarly, if I tell you that my wife has lost her job in the last year and our mortgage payments have gone up, while my income has fallen by 10%, can one conclude that our family is trouble making ends meet?
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:55 am
Source is GMATprep and I wonder if we can have such flaws in GMATprep questions
VERY unlikely. As Kevin says, just id the question type, and follow the instructions. There is NO ambiguity in the interpretation of the stimulus or the answer choices. (On the GMAT, especially in the verbal section, removing ambiguity is by far the most importan design issue that the test-maker faces.)

The only reason I thought it may have been bad is because the correct answer-the resolver-is unlikely. That actually doesn't make it a flawed question though. All GMAT questions are vetted and then administered as experimental questions. If a certain expected fraction select the accredited response (accounting for difficulty level), then the question stands. Because this is an official GMAT question, it must be the case that not too many people were bothered by the fact that the resolver was unlikely (indeed, it is possible that not too many people even noticed or thought about that).
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion