The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about $1.7 trillion to the exchequer.
A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting
b vs C
Meaning
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:05 pm
- Jim@StratusPrep
- MBA Admissions Consultant
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
- Location: New York
- Thanked: 660 times
- Followed by:266 members
- GMAT Score:770
B indicates that the spectrum scam was done by the Supreme Court.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
- Lifetron
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:51 am
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:3 members
B can't be the right answer. In B, 'which' refers to the supreme court and implies that supreme court resulted in a loss !pankajjindal wrote:The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about $1.7 trillion to the exchequer.
A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting
B vs C
Hence C !
Mitch's explanation - https://www.beatthegmat.com/telecom-mini ... 70413.html
- Lifetron
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:51 am
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:3 members
Can someone explain in detail why D is wrong here ?
I don't quite get the concept of indictment ! Everyone is getting that it took place sometime in the past. Why can't it happen now ? What is the indication that it took place in the past ?
I don't quite get the concept of indictment ! Everyone is getting that it took place sometime in the past. Why can't it happen now ? What is the indication that it took place in the past ?