BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette sm

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorAT » Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:00 am
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette smokers switch brands. Yet the manufacturers have been spending an amount equal to 10 percent of their gross receipts on cigarette promotion in magazines. It follows from these figures that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay, and that cigarette companies would have been no worse off economically if they had dropped their advertising.

Of the following, the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on

(A) computing advertising costs as a percentage of gross receipts, not of overall costs
(B) past patterns of smoking and may not carry over to the future
(C) the assumption that each smoker is loyal to a single brand of cigarettes at any one time
(D) the assumption that each manufacturer produces only one brand of cigarettes
(E) figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company

OA: E

What's the best approach to determine the answer? Any experts can help please?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Fri Jul 13, 2018 2:03 am
Option A - INCORRECT.
Since the equivalent of 10 percent of smokers switch brand every year, then it is uneconomical for manufacturers to spend 10% of the gross profit on advertisement, because it may not yield a profitable result on their part. Therefore it is assumed such fund should be used for other expenses.

Option B - INCORRECT.
Inducing cigarette smokers to switch brand did not pay, because it is an addiction and the past pattern of smoking may not be carried to the future if there is a change in personality.

Option C - INCORRECT.
The assumption that each smokers is loyal to a single brand of cigarette at any time is conclusive on the fact that inducing smokers to switch brands does not pay.

Option D - INCORRECT.
The assumption that only each manufacturer produces one brand of cigarette may not be true. Therefore, inducing smokers to switch brands may not be profitable to the manufacturer.

Option E - CORRECT.
Figures of the cigarette industry as a whole and may not for a particular company. However, Advertising appeals may not be effective when inducing smokers to switch brands because the smokers has a decision to make when choosing the most suitable choice of cigarette good for their health.
Join the discussion