BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Groups

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ssbhowmick » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:31 pm
I think it is A..

If the number of spending bill for X is less than Y but the sum of the amount of each bill for X exceeds Y (no matter how much tax payer money is involved), then the calculation will be wrong. .

Not sure whether I am right or not.. !!
Peace
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:41 pm
IMO B

I am not sure If I understood the question correctly.

My guess would be B, since if we take B into effect, number of members in X or Y would alter the result.
Join the discussion

by arorag » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:52 pm
To me C is more appropriate... As all the bills are going to pass anyways then allegation of more spending of tax payer money is useless
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:17 pm
Conclusion:

Congressional members of X authorize more spending of tax payer's dollars than members of part Y.

Premise:

More spending bills were passed.

Assumption: The fewer spending bills of Y dont spend more taxpayers' dollars then the more spending bills of X.

Answer choice A handles this.

Hence A.
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:35 am
OA - A
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:38 pm
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Join the discussion