BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Sum survey challenge (made up)

Expert replies
by Mathsbuddy » Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:44 pm
If S is the sum of c consecutive integers where S < 100,c>1 and s * c = n^2 (where n is also an integer), can the following statement be true?

s*c is not equal to any multiple of 3.

(I would be interested in seeing your reasoning/logic/proof for your answer too.)

Made up while driving home last night, so I can't guarantee any GMat authenticity.
I would also be interested to know how you would rate how easy/challenging you found this question compared to real GMat questions. (It is not research, so no data will be stored; just personal curiosity for pitching questions right in future).

Rating scale:


1 = too easy
2 = as easy has the easiest GMat questions
3 = easier than most GMat questions
4 = about as easy or hard as the average thGMat questions
5 = harder than most GMat questions
6 = as hard has the hardest GMat questions
7 = much harder than the toughest GMat questions

Many thanks :)
Last edited by Mathsbuddy on Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by ganeshrkamath » Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:23 am
Mathsbuddy wrote:If S is the sum of c consecutive integers where S < 100,c>1 and s * c = n^2 (where n is also an integer), can the following statement be true?

s*c is not equal to 81.
S = (average of c consecutive integers) * c
S = (average of c consecutive integers) * c
S*c = (average of c consecutive integers) * c^2 = n^2

So average of c consecutive integers should be a perfect square.
Clearly, c should be an odd number.

Let c = 3 (smallest possible positive odd number after 1)
and average = 4 (smallest possible perfect square after 1)
The numbers are (3,4,5)
S = 12
S*c = 12*3 = 36 = 6^2

So the statement can be true.

Mathsbuddy wrote:(I would be interested in seeing your reasoning/logic/proof for your answer too.)

Made up while driving home last night, so I can't guarantee any GMat authenticity.
I would also be interested to know how you would rate how easy/challenging you found this question compared to real GMat questions. (It is not research, so no data will be stored; just personal curiosity for pitching questions right in future).

Rating scale:


1 = too easy
2 = as easy has the easiest GMat questions
3 = easier than most GMat questions
4 = about as easy or hard as the average thGMat questions
5 = harder than most GMat questions
6 = as hard has the hardest GMat questions
7 = much harder than the toughest GMat questions

Many thanks :)
I've never encountered such GMAT questions in any of my mocks or the actual test.
It's definitely hard. I would give it a 6. :)

Cheers,
Ganesh
Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it. Autograph your work with excellence.

Kelley School of Business (Class of 2016)
GMAT Score: 750 V40 Q51 AWA 5 IR 8
https://www.beatthegmat.com/first-attemp ... tml#688494
Join the discussion

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:28 am
ganeshrkamath wrote:
Mathsbuddy wrote:If S is the sum of c consecutive integers where S < 100,c>1 and s * c = n^2 (where n is also an integer), can the following statement be true?

s*c is not equal to 81.
S = (average of c consecutive integers) * c
S = (average of c consecutive integers) * c
S*c = (average of c consecutive integers) * c^2 = n^2

So average of c consecutive integers should be a perfect square.
Clearly, c should be an odd number.

Let c = 3 (smallest possible positive odd number after 1)
and average = 4 (smallest possible perfect square after 1)
The numbers are (3,4,5)
S = 12
S*c = 12*3 = 36 = 6^2

So the statement can be true.

Mathsbuddy wrote:(I would be interested in seeing your reasoning/logic/proof for your answer too.)

Made up while driving home last night, so I can't guarantee any GMat authenticity.
I would also be interested to know how you would rate how easy/challenging you found this question compared to real GMat questions. (It is not research, so no data will be stored; just personal curiosity for pitching questions right in future).

Rating scale:


1 = too easy
2 = as easy has the easiest GMat questions
3 = easier than most GMat questions
4 = about as easy or hard as the average thGMat questions
5 = harder than most GMat questions
6 = as hard has the hardest GMat questions
7 = much harder than the toughest GMat questions

Many thanks :)
I've never encountered such GMAT questions in any of my mocks or the actual test.
It's definitely hard. I would give it a 6. :)

Cheers,
Ganesh
Well done! As you beat the system, I have now made the question more interesting:
Can it be that s*c is not equal to any multiple of 3?

Thank you.
Join the discussion

by ganeshrkamath » Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:04 am
Mathsbuddy wrote:Well done! As you beat the system, I have now made the question more interesting:
Can it be that s*c is not equal to any multiple of 3?

Thank you.
For S*c to be not equal to a multiple of 3:
c shouldn't be a multiple of 3
Let c = 5 (the next smallest odd number)
Again, average of the c consecutive numbers should be a perfect square:
Let average = 1 (the smallest possible perfect square)
The numbers are (-1,0,1,2,3)
S = 5
c = 5
S*c = 25 = 5^2

So, S*c need not be a multiple of 3.

Cheers,
Ganesh
Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it. Autograph your work with excellence.

Kelley School of Business (Class of 2016)
GMAT Score: 750 V40 Q51 AWA 5 IR 8
https://www.beatthegmat.com/first-attemp ... tml#688494
Join the discussion

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:28 am
ganeshrkamath wrote:
Mathsbuddy wrote:Well done! As you beat the system, I have now made the question more interesting:
Can it be that s*c is not equal to any multiple of 3?

Thank you.
For S*c to be not equal to a multiple of 3:
c shouldn't be a multiple of 3
Let c = 5 (the next smallest odd number)
Again, average of the c consecutive numbers should be a perfect square:
Let average = 1 (the smallest possible perfect square)
The numbers are (-1,0,1,2,3)
S = 5
c = 5
S*c = 25 = 5^2

So, S*c need not be a multiple of 3.

Cheers,
Ganesh
Well done, you found the solution with ease! I was trying to "hide" the fact that there was a negative value in the list, but you got it. I think its the only solution, or at least that was the intention. Thank you for trying it out!
Join the discussion

by rahul.sehgal@btgchampion » Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:21 am
ganeshrkamath wrote:
Mathsbuddy wrote:If S is the sum of c consecutive integers where S < 100,c>1 and s * c = n^2 (where n is also an integer), can the following statement be true?

s*c is not equal to 81.
S = (average of c consecutive integers) * c
S = (average of c consecutive integers) * c
S*c = (average of c consecutive integers) * c^2 = n^2

So average of c consecutive integers should be a perfect square.
Clearly, c should be an odd number.

Let c = 3 (smallest possible positive odd number after 1)
and average = 4 (smallest possible perfect square after 1)
The numbers are (3,4,5)
S = 12
S*c = 12*3 = 36 = 6^2

So the statement can be true.

Mathsbuddy wrote:(I would be interested in seeing your reasoning/logic/proof for your answer too.)

Made up while driving home last night, so I can't guarantee any GMat authenticity.
I would also be interested to know how you would rate how easy/challenging you found this question compared to real GMat questions. (It is not research, so no data will be stored; just personal curiosity for pitching questions right in future).

Rating scale:


1 = too easy
2 = as easy has the easiest GMat questions
3 = easier than most GMat questions
4 = about as easy or hard as the average thGMat questions
5 = harder than most GMat questions
6 = as hard has the hardest GMat questions
7 = much harder than the toughest GMat questions

Many thanks :)
I've never encountered such GMAT questions in any of my mocks or the actual test.
It's definitely hard. I would give it a 6. :)

Cheers,
Ganesh

Ganesh - I have been following your solutions and I must say you are very helpful. Could you help me understand when you say - 'Clearly, c should be an odd number' in your solution above..

I might be missing a trick here.. Thanks in advance and I wish you best for your ISB application :)
Best Regards,
Rahul Sehgal
Join the discussion

by naseem_iqbal » Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:20 am
If c was an even number, their average would not be an integer. To avoid confusion, imagine all numbers on a number line. Since they are all consecutive, the average should be exactly on the center. If there were an even number of numbers, avg would be something point 5.
Join the discussion