BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

It is naive

Expert replies
by YellowSapphire » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:06 am
Lenore: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective. In evaluating evidence, historians are always influenced by their national, political, and class loyalties.
Victor: Still, the very fact that cases of biased thinking have been detected and sources of bias identified shows that there are people who can maintain objectivity.

Victor's response does not succeed as a rebuttal of Lenore's argument because his response

(A) displays the same kind of biased thinking as that against which Lenore's argument it directed
(B) does not address the special case of historians who purposely distort evidence in order to promote their own political objectives
(C) fails to provide examples of cases in which biased thinking has been detected and the source of that bias identified
(D) does not consider sources of bias in historical explanation other than those that are due to national, political, and class loyalties
(E) overlooks the possibility that those who detect and identify bias are themselves biased in some way

OA: E
Last edited by YellowSapphire on Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:24 am, edited 2 times in total.
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:23 am
1)it is wrong to think X can have proofs. historians are biased by Y
2) Biased cases are found and historians are biased based on proof

Why is 2 wrong?
Opinion: proofs in [2] are wrong

IMO D... It gave me a tough 3.30min... I am skeptic about my answer
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by amitu » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:34 am
E
the argument is based on premise that people are biased .
Join the discussion

by champmag » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:39 am
+1 for E. According to Victor's argument the very fact that biased thinking is detected is the reason for objectivity to exist. What if the person who is detecting the biased thinking is himself biased. Then there would be no room for objectivity. So Op E captures this correctly.
Join the discussion

by force5 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 4:58 am
little difficult.

B says political objectives (out)
C- example not needed wont help ( out)
D- source of bias not needed (Out)

left with A and E.

liked A but then on a deeper thought removed A.
(A), perhaps not because, Lenore's comment was not against biased historians or any bias in particular. So, when Victor speaks about bias he forgets to understand that the people who have detected some historians to be biased, could have been biased as well. So, (E) fits in well here.
Join the discussion

by rahul_tgsp » Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:54 am
i ll go with E
Join the discussion

by Sharma_Gaurav » Sun Mar 25, 2012 2:48 am
I have serious doubts regarding the wordings of option E.

If this option said (E) overlooks the possibility that those who detect and identify bias CAN BE themselves biased in some way.

Then E would have been more clearer or serious contender. Well how can we definitely say for sure that ppl who are detecting are biased already????/

Experts please explain and throw some more night on this??
Join the discussion