BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Students Height

Expert replies
by BlindVision » Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:29 pm
For the students in class A, the range of their heights is r centimeters and the greatest height is g centimeters. For the students in class B, the range of their heights is s centimeters and the greatest height is h centimeters. Is the least height of the students in class A greater than the least height of the students in class B?


1) r < s

2) g > h


OA = C
Life is a Test
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mehravikas » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:08 pm
You can pick number for these problems:

Start from statement 2: g > h, no other information is given about r, s and least height.

Answer can be: A, C, E

Statement 1: r < s, let r = 8, s = 10
r = 14 - 6
s = 15 - 5 or 17 - 7

Not sufficient.

combine both the statements and pick numbers satisfying both the answer choices.
r = 8, s = 10, g = 14, h = 12
r = 14 - x1
s = 12 - x2

we know that r < s therefore, x1 is greater than x2
Join the discussion

by BlindVision » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:53 pm
Thanks for the help but I got lost on the combining part. Can you please help me better understand that last part?

P.S. When I combine, I get: r < s < h < g . Is that right?

P.S.S. Maybe I'm not understanding the question stem: Is it asking 'Which of the two classes has the most shortest students'?
Life is a Test
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:18 pm
BlindVision wrote:Thanks for the help but I got lost on the combining part. Can you please help me better understand that last part?

P.S. When I combine, I get: r < s < h < g . Is that right?

P.S.S. Maybe I'm not understanding the question stem: Is it asking 'Which of the two classes has the most shortest students'?
you already have got the individual parts. so lets see what happens when we combine both
plug in numbers
let r=15
g=20
so least height in class A is 5
now plug in numbers for B
r<s so lets say s is 16
g>h
so lets say h=19
lest height in B is 3 i.e less than 5
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:58 pm
Combining both, least element in ClassB has to be less than ClassA.

(C)
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:03 am
Ian's post:

dragonxiam- when you chose numbers here, you made r larger than s, when it should be smaller than s, which is why you've arrived at the wrong answer.

Neither statement is sufficient on its own- clearly we need to know about r, s, g and h here. Together we know:

s > r
g > h

These inequalities are in the same direction, so we can add them:

s+g > r+h
g-r > h-s

So we've shown that the smallest height in class A, which is g-r, is larger than the smallest height in class B, which is h-s. C.
Join the discussion